| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Why and How? |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
Five
Types of Documents
- Policy Statements: A “policy statement”
establishes the fundamental principles that guide the denomination’s
social witness. From this policy base a strategy is developed,
a program is defined, and personal social witness is empowered.
The most current policy document produced in conformance to
the requirements of 2.a-g. of this document and adopted by
a General Assembly shall be the policy in force. Any previous
policies and statements, having been examined and considered
by the group producing the new policy, shall be superceded
by the adoption of the most current policy. When requests
for policy statements are made, the most recent policy statement
shall be given; however, past statements shall be included
in full response to requests for information.
- Resolution: A “resolution”
applies existing policy statements to new circumstances.
- Study Documents: A “study paper”
is designed to stimulate churchwide study of a social concern,
social witness policy, or social witness. It does not need
to be an elaboration of existing policy statements.
- Social Involvement Reports (also called
Monitoring Reports): A “social involvement report”
evaluates Presbyterian social witness in light of particular
social concerns and existing policy statements.
- Advice and Counsel Memorandums: An “Advice
and Counsel Memorandum” (also known as an “A&C”)
provide relevant background, context, and possible consequences
of General Assembly action on overtures, reports, and actions
that recommend policy direction or action on social witness.
An A&C may also be addressed to the General Assembly Mission Council
members as the Council deliberates, prepares recommendations
for, or implements policies of the General Assembly.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
What
is the process for developing a new social witness policy statement?
The process of developing social witness policy is
one of discernment— discerning the mind of Jesus Christ
for the church and the world. The discernment process must be
lived out and involve the whole church. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
There is, first of all, a
need; The church needs policy on a new issue. Often that
need arises in a session or presbytery through an overture or
a Commissioners’ Resolution to the General Assembly. Either
there is no existing policy or current policy has become dated
and no longer useful.
The ACSWP receives a request from the General Assembly
or the General Assembly Mission Council (or from its own study and initiative
decides) to develop new policy or revise current policy in need
of updating. A prospectus is prepared, describing the proposed
new policy work to be undertaken. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
A one-page summary of the prospectus
is sent to all congregations and presbyteries with an invitation
to send feedback as well as nominations of people to serve on
a task force to develop the policy. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
The ACSWP receives all
the nominations and the feedback and selects a task
force charged with developing its process to draft a policy
statement. The task force begins its work drawing on a number
of resources, including the following:
- The voices of the biblical text;
- The wisdom of theological discourse;
- The guidance of the Reformed confessions;
- The tradition of past policy statements;
- The insights of sociopolitical disciplines;
- The advice of members and all governing
bodies of the Church;
- The insights of people who are poor, victims
of existing policies and
those who have the counsel of ecumenical partners.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
Generally, one of the task force’s
first tasks is to engage the church in a study process
on the issue at hand. A study paper is developed to stimulate
study and discussion in the congregations and presbyteries about
the issues to be addressed by the task force. Made available
with a “user-friendly” feedback form, the task force
allows at least twelve months for the churchwide study period
and will not report to an Assembly until six months have elapsed
after the official study period.
Meanwhile during the study, the task force itself continues
its own research and reflection on the issues, adding to and
shaping its reflection by feedback received from the
congregations. The task force completes its study and presents
a proposed policy statement to the ACSWP.
Now the ACSWP must take ‘ownership’ of the
policy statement through discussion and debate — first with
the task force representatives and then among themselves. They
revise or rewrite, clarify or delete, portions of the paper
until they ‘own’ it and are willing to send it to
a Synod Consultation for further churchwide feedback. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
The General Assembly Mission Council (GAMC)
and the ACSWP call a Synod Consultation. Each synod is
invited to send a representative and a written report from the
consultation members is sent to the GAMC and the ACSWP. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
The Synod Consultation Report
is considered by the ACSWP in consultation with the GAMC and — as
history has shown — much of the report is incorporated into
the ACSWP’s proposed policy statement. After further discussion
and assuming no further revisions are necessary, the ACSWP submits
the proposed policy statement to the General Assembly.
This ‘final draft’ of the ACSWP now becomes the
‘working draft’ of the General Assembly
and the Assembly commissioners — first in committee and then
as a whole in plenary — must now ‘own’ the document.
The ACSWP is there to resource the commissioners, but the Assembly
must decide to approve the document, make changes, refer it
back for further work, or disapprove it. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Once approved, the policy statement
becomes the policy of the General Assembly, guiding and empowering
its mission and work, advocacy and witness. The church’s
social witness is multidirectional and multilateral; however,
no social witness policy may purport to bind the conscience
of individual members of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.).
The ACSWP is responsible for the process of developing and
recommending social witness policy to the General Assembly.
If any other entity is involved in processes of developing and
recommending social witness policy, then appropriate consultation
and linkage with the ACSWP shall be undertaken. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
How
often and when does the Committee meet?
The ACSWP meets three times a year. The meeting cycle begins
following a General Assembly. Generally speaking, at this summer
meeting (July or August), the ACSWP receives new referrals from
the General Assembly, reflects on emerging issues, and hears
updates on work in progress. The fall meeting (October) offers
the ACSWP an opportunity to receive reports on work in progress,
evaluate projects in process, write and edit drafts, and deepen
its knowledge of specific work and the church. At its winter
meeting (January), the ACSWP approves for submission to the
Assembly policy statements, resolutions, and recommendations
to the next General Assembly.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| |
Respect for Documents and Stated Clerk Opinion
Along with the updated note from the Coordinator (below), we upload two related papers discussed since the late January ACSWP meeting (Louisville, KY). These papers are a statement of the ACSWP's concerns about the use of draft or in-process documents and an opinion by the Stated Clerk on the relationship of the Open Meeting Policy and the distribution of documents. The ACSWP will be considering these matters again at its July 2006 meeting at Fuller Seminary." [Read more] |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|