|
Constitutional Musings: Note 02
Process for the Merger of Presbyterian
Churches
The presbytery, in consultation with the two
merging congregations, has the authority (under G-11.0103h)
to unite two churches.
I. Typically the process is begun with
informal conversations between the sessions of the two congregations.
If both sessions determine such a merger may be in the best
interest of their respective congregations they normally take
one of two actions:
A. The sessions both call congregational
meetings to seek the will of the congregations and ask the
congregations to appoint persons to design a Plan of Union
if the congregations favor a merger. Again most often these
persons will work with an administrative commission or the
committee on ministry on the Plan.
B. The sessions themselves, often with input
from an administrative commission or the committee on ministry,
put together a Plan of Union to be proposed to their respective
congregations; or
C. Occasionally the suggestion that congregations
merge comes from a presbytery strategy group or from within
the committee on ministry. In such cases the possibility is
then normally raised in the sessions of the congregations.
In our experience option "A" tends
to be more efficient in that normally the sessions have a pretty
good idea about how their respective congregations feel about
a possible merger. We believe it is most often helpful for the
sessions to design and carry out some consultative process to
determine interest and feasibility. A process similar to those
used in doing mission studies has often been helpful.
II. Whichever process is utilized, at some
point a Plan for Union will need to be prepared. There are
a number of items which we believe need to be in this document.
A. It needs to contain some process for
the election of the session of the new merged congregation.
There are a number of options that we have seen work quite
well.
1. The members of the sessions of both
congregations (less those whose terms end at the merger)
are elected to the session of the new merged congregation.
It may be that the plan for merger allows for an expanded
session until such time as the terms of all the elders serving
at the time of merger expire. After those terms have expired,
the number on the session may be reduced to the number considered
optimal.
2. An entirely new session may be elected
at the organizing congregational meeting. The nominating
committees of the respective congregations may nominate
persons from "their" church. The nominees will
need to be elected to one, two, and three year terms to
begin a nominating rotation.
B. It needs to contain some provision for
the transfer of all current property, real and personal. It
also needs to make reference that the new congregation is
the successor in interest so that any testimonial, trust,
or foundational gifts can be received by the successor congregation.
All such transfers need to include a reference that all property
is held "for the use and benefit of the Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.).
1. Former PCUS congregations contemplating
such mergers, who wish to maintain exceptions claimed under
G-8.0701, need to exercise care to assure that their corporate
and ecclesiastical existence continue under the new merged
congregation.
2. The plan should also contain provision
for the handling and disposition of personal property. This
is often very important for the continuing congregation.
Many of those items have emotional impact for the members.
A number of options can be explored. Many of the items can
surely continue to be used by the new congregations. Those
that can't can be shared with other congregations in the
presbytery. In any case the Plan for Union needs to pastorally
deal with such property and its disposition.
a. This is an area where the Book
of Order allows for great flexibility. It is likewise
an area that greatly benefits from creative Presbyterians
committed to assuring that all the assets promote the
Church's mission. In some ways those mergers that result
in an entirely new physical plant have the easier task,
because all members are starting out from the same position
with the same history in the building. For those mergers
that will utilize one, both, or parts of each physical
plant great care needs to be exercised. Often the facilities,
even particular personal property, carry almost sacred
connotations for members. This is an area where wise sessions
and presbyteries will seek input from a wide range of
members. While this is an area involving few constitutional
issues, it is the area that most profoundly affects the
success or failure of a merger.
C. It needs to make some provision for the
pastoral leadership of the new congregation. The Book of
Order allows the pastor(s) of the former churches to continue
as or become the pastor or pastors of the new congregation.
The Plan for Union needs to describe the initial pastoral
staffing plan. The session, or congregational planning team,
should work with the Committee on Ministry to consider the
various options available and desirable.
1. The presbytery, or the COM if such
authority has been specifically delegated to them, needs
to act on whatever changes in pastoral relationship are
decided upon.
a. If new positions are created, or
"old" ones deleted, the presbytery needs to
take specific action to do so in precisely the same manner
it would in normal pastoral staff redesign.
2. This is an area of direct presbytery
involvement or even intervention. How well the presbytery
handles this transition, whatever model it follows, is another
significant determiner of the success or failure of a merger.
D. It needs to describe a process for the
vote on the Plan for Union as well as the process for adopting
bylaws for the new congregation.
1. It is usually helpful for the Plan
for Union to carefully describe the new church's organizational
structure. How detailed this description is varies greatly
across mergers. The key here is balance, between sufficient
detail and binding the future without adequate knowledge
of future structural needs.
E. It needs to give the name of the new
merged congregation and empower the session, or some other
group, to create a new corporation or modify the Articles
of Incorporation and/or Bylaws of the corporation to accurately
describe the new congregation.
F. It needs to place the responsibility
of planning the final services of the two congregations as
separate congregations as well as place the responsibility
for the planning to the initial service of the merged congregation.
Doing this well is always worth the time. It brings closure
and celebrates new beginnings.
III. The presbytery must vote to approve
the merger.
A. It may wish to appoint an Administrative
Commission to carry out the presbytery's responsibilities.
1. Only the presbytery itself may approve
the merger itself, but it may delegate empowering authority
to allow a commission to work with the congregations as
they carry out the Plan for Union.
2. The commission would need to be specifically
empowered to dissolve, merge, and create, pursuant to the
Plan for Union approved by the presbytery.
3. It is often helpful for the commission to be empowered,
along with the committee on ministry, to work through all
the issues surrounding pastoral leadership.
4. The empowering motion needs to carefully
delineate what authority and responsibility lies with the
session and what authority and responsibility lies with
the commission.
IV. The Stated Clerk of the presbytery
needs to report the dissolution of congregations and the creation
of the new congregation to:
A. The Office of the General Assembly (and
obtain a new pin number from (OGA)
B. Using that new Pin number, report to
the Board of Pensions.
V. It is important to remember that
there is no "right" way to do a merger.
Each situation is unique. So long as the congregations and the
presbytery follow the limited specific requirements of the Form
of Government, there is a fair amount of freedom to act pastorally,
yet wisely. |