| |
Overture
04-04. On Striking G-6.0106b from The Constitution
in Order to Welcome All Persons into the Life of the Church—From
the Presbytery of Baltimore.
The Presbytery of Baltimore overtures the
216th General Assembly (2004) of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
to direct the Stated Clerk to send the following proposed amendment
to the presbyteries for their affirmative or negative vote:
Shall G-6.0106b be stricken from the
Book of Order.
Rationale
The peace, unity, and purity of the PC(USA)
have been ruptured by the presence of G-6.0106b in our Book
of Order. Rather than solving the issue of ordination standards,
this addition has created a hostile and divisive environment in
our church that is contrary to God’s reconciling love. Numerous
judicial cases have been brought to governing bodies over issues
of ordination from individuals who are unaware of the calls and
gifts of ministry of those against whom they file complaints.
These judicial actions have cost individuals, congregations, and
governing bodies untold time and money to defend those who have
been accused. There is no longer any possibility of honest and
open dialogue on this issue without fear of retribution. Section
G-6.0106b does serious harm to our church by forcing the appearance
of consensus and depriving the church of the benefit of discussion.
The wisdom expressed in G-6.0106a is sufficient
in setting standards for ordination. The strength of the PC(USA)
lies in its ability to hold freedom of conscience and church order
in tension, and its trust of the governing body closest to those
it ordains (G-6.0108b). Sessions and presbyteries have the responsibility
to weigh the confessions, to determine which segments reflect
essential tenets of the faith, and to judge the gifts and qualifications
of those candidates who come before them.
The effects of G-6.0106b are contrary to
our constitutional call to “seek the grace of openness
in extending the fellowship of Christ to all persons”(G-5.0103).
Instead it has the explicit and implicit effect of targeting
one category of people, defined as “self-affirming, practicing
homosexual persons,” and of denying to them the full rights
and privileges of active membership within the Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.) (G-5.0202). Through this constitutional ban,
G-6.0106b disregards the fact that a pluralism of methods of
biblical and theological interpretation currently exists within
the PC(USA) concerning homosexuality. Among these methods is
the strongly held belief among many conscientious Presbyterians
that homosexual practice is not a sin per se and that both heterosexual
and homosexual relationships are capable of being either faithful
and life-affirming or sinful and destructive. Section G-6.0106b,
and its predecessor “definitive guidance” and subsequent
affirmations, delineates human sexuality in categories more
narrowly defined than the Scriptures seek to claim. For example,
while Christians disagree on the interpretation of the limited
biblical references to homosexuality, most acknowledge that
the Bible is silent on the issue of lifelong, faithful homosexual
partnerships. In contrast, the Bible is clear in its themes
of covenant: the covenant between God and humanity, and the
human covenants made before God. Removal of G-6.0106b from our
Constitution would allow presbyteries and sessions
to follow their understanding of the Holy Spirit’s leading
in making decisions about candidates for ordination/installation
by the application of a common ethic
of faithfulness and fidelity within human covenantal relationships.
This return to a mutual trust in each ordaining/installing presbytery’s
or session’s ability to make individual judgments concerning
the fitness of a candidate for ordination/installation would
restore to the presbyteries and sessions their traditional duty
and prerogative to approve, ordain, and install persons whom,
after due examination, they deem gifted, worthy, and called
by God through the voice of the people.
Concurrences to Overture 04-4 from the Presbyteries of National
Capital and New England.
Concurrence to Overture 04-4—From
the Presbytery of Des Moines (with Additional Rationale).
Rationale
In concurrence with the Presbytery of Baltimore,
we agree that “the effects of G-6.0106b are contrary to
our constitutional call to seed the grace of openness in extending
the fellowship of Christ to all persons (G-9.0104). Failure
to do so constitutes a rejection of Christ himself and causes
a scandal of the Gospel (G-5.0103).”
The Presbytery of Des Moines has historically
supported this particular issue.
Referring to the PC(USA) Website, the Presbyterian
101 statement (“A General Guide to the Facts About the
PCUSA”) under the heading “Presbyterian are BELIEVERS
AND DOERS,” Paragraph 2 appears to be in conflict with
G-6.0106b. It states; “WE BELIEVE—in a theology
of mission, as expressed in the Westminster Confession of Faith,
Christ hath commissioned the Church to go into the world and
to make disciples of all nations. All believers are
therefore under obligation—to contribute by their prayers,
gifts, and personal efforts to the extension of the Kingdom
of Christ throughout the whole earth.” In “Presbyterians
are Attuned to the Times (Page 2), “the church”
also adapts to newly emerging needs and to changing relationships
in a sensitive manner.”
The Theological Task Force on Peace,
Unity, and Purity of the Church (Mandate 1b) was established
to pursue a process of discernment for the church. “This
discernment shall include but not be limited to issues of Christology,
biblical authority and interpretations, ordination standards,
and power.” It will not report back to the assembly until
2006. It was not formed to make decisions on behalf of the
General Assembly and/or the presbyteries. The same General
Assembly in 2001 sent a proposed amendment to the Constitution
to the presbyteries that would remove G-6.0106b.
|
|