| Overture
04-39. On Expressing Our Solidarity with the Presbyterian
Church in Taiwan and with the Taiwanese People—From the
Presbytery of New Covenant.
The Presbytery of New Covenant overtures the 216th General
Assembly (2004) of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) take the
following actions:
1. Humbly reaffirm the action of the 206th General Assembly
(1994) of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), in which it affirms
the “Resolution on the Future of Taiwan” (Minutes,
1994, Part I, p. 109; for text of resolution, see Minutes,
1983, Part I, pp. 446-47) and supports self-determination for
people of Taiwan and for the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan in
its struggle for freedom and human rights; and its support for
Taiwan and its national integrity and selfhood in the community
of nations.
2. Humbly direct the Stated Clerk to express our solidarity
with the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan and with the Taiwanese
people.
3. Humbly direct the Stated Clerk to express our support for
the Taiwanese people to participate in the World Health Organization
(WHO) to the president of the United States and urge the president
to follow through with the action already taken by the United
States Congress to the World Health Organization to accept Taiwan
to be a member of WHO. Additionally, direct the Stated Clerk
to also express our support for the Taiwanese people to the
members of the United States Congress.
4. Humbly direct the United Nations Office of the Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.) to advocate for Taiwan’s application for
WHO membership to international organizations whenever opportunities
arise.
Rationale
According to the United States Center for Disease Control
weekly report, on April 22, 2003, the Taiwan Department of Health
(DOH) was notified of seven cases of severe acute respiratory
syndrome (SARS) among health-care workers at a large municipal
hospital in Taipei. Subsequently, as of May 22, 2003, a total
of 483 probable cases had been reported, including 45 cases
among health-care workers, and 26 (19 percent) persons died.
The non-membership status left Taiwan without access to time-sensitive
information through the United Nations World Health Organization’s
(WHO) Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network (GOARN), which
dissipates essential information on the management and control
of communicable and infectious diseases, such as SARS.
World Health Organization personnel arrived after SARS had
been active in Taiwan already seven weeks. There were thirteen
deaths reported between March 17 and May 7 (as of May 12, the
number of deaths was twenty-four). Furthermore, WHO personnel
while in Taiwan were prohibited from speaking directly to Taiwan’s
government official or from making any public statement. At
that time, the Taiwanese government and the United States Center
for Disease Control had effectively enforced quarantine while
WHO listed Taiwan in the international travel advisory category.
Although Taiwan was not a WHO member country, it adhered to
WHO guidelines in transmitting its daily evaluation and status
reports to WHO. The Taiwanese government promptly reported new
cases voluntarily, unlike the lack of cooperation by People’s
Republic of China, which downplayed SARS virus outbreak severity
and prohibited media reports and WHO evaluation until the SARS
virus had spread to Hong Kong and Canada. By concealing the
SARS outbreak, China was responsible for the infection of more
than 8,000 people in more than thirty countries.
The WHO is mandated to “attainment by all peoples of
the highest possible level of health.” Nevertheless, the
23 million Taiwanese people were deprived of their human rights
to the services that WHO provides. Ironically, while the World
Health Assembly rejected Taiwan’s bid for membership during
the May 19-28, 2003, eighty-nine Taiwanese people died subsequently
from SARS infection.
The SARS infection in Taiwan constituted a medical emergency
according to WHO’s categorical system. More than thirty
nations were infected by SARS, but only Canada, China, Hong
Kong, and Taiwan were listed in WHO international travel advisory
category as well as in the Pattern C of local transmission.
In the past, Taiwan has experienced WHO’s exclusion with
devastating consequence. In 1998, the entero virus infection
was transmitted from Malaysia that claimed the lives of nearly
eighty Taiwanese children while Taiwan’s request for information
in the virus outbreak was ignored by WHO.
Taiwan’s population of 23,500,000 people is greater than
that of three-fourths of the member states already in the WHO.
While the 23 million people of Taiwan are entitled to equal
and fair protection under the WHO system, Taiwan is also committed
to do its part by working together with the world community
and contributing its resources and experiences in order to advance
the noble goal of health for all peoples. For example, in response
to the 911 terrorist attacks in New York in 2001 and the resulting
worldwide antiterrorist campaign, Taiwan has also contributed
in significant ways. Both the Taiwan Tzu Chi Charity Foundation
and the Taiwan Red Cross, for instance, swiftly assisted the
victims and their families. Together with overseas donations
and government contributions, Taiwan provided more than US$20
million to the Afghanistan humanitarian relief effort¾including
medical goods, freight trucks, wool blankets, and other supplies.
Furthermore, four Taiwanese medical teams are currently stationed
in Burkina Faso, Malawi, Chad, and Sao Tome and Principe, where
they assist the respective local governments.
The United States government has been actively advocating for
the observer status for Taiwan in WHO. In addition, the United
States Congress passed H.R. 422 and S. 243 that authorized the
secretary of state to “initiate a United States plan to
endorse and obtain observer status for Taiwan at the annual
weeklong summit of World Health Assembly in May 2003 in Geneva,
Switzerland.” The H.R. 422 and S. 243 were signed into
public law by President Bush on May 29, 2003 (Public Law No:
108-28 bbc). |