Questions and
Answers: Rev. Clifton Kirkpatrick
What do you see as the most important issues facing
the church and the General Assembly and why?
I believe the most important issue facing the Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.) today is that of reconciliation. Two years ago
we celebrated the thirty-fifth anniversary of the Confession
of 1967. As we focused on that confession across the church,
I came to a renewed conviction that this confession, written
in the turbulent decade of the 1960s, centered on the primary
issue before the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) in our time—
how the church can give faithful expression to the good news
of Scripture that “God was in Christ reconciling the world…and
giving to us the ministry of reconciliation” (2 Cor. 5:19).
We live in a world that, on all sides, is hungry for reconciliation.
It is a world where:
•warfare, poverty, and violence seem to be getting
out of control,
•people desperately need the reconciling love of God
in Jesus Christ,
•religious communities are in deep discord and threatening
to produce a “conflict of civilizations.”
We also are part of a church that is hungry for reconciliation—reconciliation
with Christ and with oneanother so that we might be Christ’s
agents of reconciliation in a divided world. I have sought in
myministry as Stated Clerk to be about those things that can
bring Presbyterians together around the deeperreconciliation
that we find in Christ and to be about this ministry of reconciliation
in the world.
Our Book of Order makes the bold claim that “the
Church of Jesus Christ is a living demonstration of what God
intends for all humanity” (G-3.0200). Since God’s
ultimate purpose in human history is to reconcile the world,
as we find so clearly stated in Scripture and in the Confession
of 1967, no task could
be more urgent for the church than to model the reconciling
love that God intends for us in the body of Christ, not as an
end in itself, but as a living demonstration of what God intends
for the whole human family. May it be true for the Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A) in our time!
What is your vision of the church for the future, and
what specifically would you do as Stated Clerk to assist in
accomplishing that vision?
My vision is that the PC(USA) will become a church that is
a living expression of the vision of the church found in the
first four chapters of our Form of Government. It is a church:
•with a renewed commitment to the living Christ, who
is “Head of the Church,” to the Great Ends of
the Church, and to the historic principles of church order
and church government (chapter 1);
•devoted to Scripture and grounded in the theological
vision described in The Book of Confessions
•alive in mission as “Christ’s faithful
evangelist” (chapter 3);
•that seeks unity and honors diversity, both within
the PC(USA) and with the broader Christian community, and
that seeks to order its life in accord with the principles
of Presbyterian
As Stated Clerk, I will continue to lift up this vision by:
•promoting what unites us as Presbyterians,
•lifting up to the church the great strengths of our
Constitution,
•upholding the Great Ends of the Church, •calling
us all to rediscover glimpses of a New Testament church in
a new century,
•supporting and seeing through to a successful conclusion
the work of the Theological Task Force on the Peace, Unity,
and Purity of the Church,
•sponsoring Common Faith, Common Mission consultations
that focus on the core values of our Constitution for the
renewal of the church,
•reshaping our polity to enable the PC(USA) to be a
truly evangelical and multicultural church in the 21st century,
•serving as our church’s chief ecumenical officer
and representing us in major leadership positions in the ecumenical
movement and the global Christian community,
•leading us in ecumenical breakthroughs such as Lutheran-Reformed
Full Communion, concurrent General Assemblies with the Cumberland
Presbyterians, and strengthened relationships with the Vatican
and with Churches Uniting in Christ,
•reshaping our General Assemblies from “political
conventions” into biennial spiritual gatherings that
seek to discern the mind of Christ for the church,
•providing leadership to the Presbyterian Historical
Society, which is the repository of the lived experience of
these values in American Presbyterianism,
•renewing and strengthening the relationships among
our governing bodies,
•bringing a spirit of cooperation among agencies of
the General Assembly in service to our congregations.
The General Assembly Standing Rules state, “As
an officer of the General Assembly, the Stated Clerk shall preserve
and defend the Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.),
and support the decisions, actions, and programs of the General
Assembly.” Describe your understanding of the
Stated Clerk’s role in carrying out this constitutional
function.
I have a unique claim to understanding the vision behind the
call upon the Stated Clerk to “preserve and defend”
our Constitution. This provision originated in the
former Presbyterian Church in the United States (PCUS) in 1974
when it was added to that denomination’s Standing Rules
for the General Assembly. If you read the minutes of the PCUS,
you will find that Clifton Kirkpatrick was the person chairing
the meeting of the Committee on Assembly Operations (their version
of what we now term the Committee on the Office of the General
Assembly) when this provision was proposed.
This is not an indication that I was shaping the constitutional
policy of our church in 1974 as a newly ordained minister! Rather,
it was my father who was moderating that meeting as a faithful
elder with a deep commitment to our Constitution—one
that he shared often with me. This commitment to “preserve
and defend” the Constitution is deeply rooted
in my family and is a responsibility that I am called and privileged
to undertake as Stated Clerk.
The first task of the Stated Clerk is to uphold the Constitution
(both The Book of Confessions and the Book of Order).
The Constitution proclaims our faith to the world and
to the church, orders our church life, shapes our worship, and
prescribes our procedures for discipline. Without such there
can be no
Presbyterian Church. The Constitution is the foundation
on which the other duties assigned to the Stated Clerk are to
be carried out. The Stated Clerk is called to uphold the Constitution
first and foremost by publishing and distributing the Constitution
(in an increasing number of languages) and by upholding its
vision and proclaiming its theology to the church. The Stated
Clerk makes clear to the church the process of constitutional
revision and reminds the church that while the honoring of dissent
is a deeply held
Presbyterian value, defying the Constitution is not.
Such defiance, if left unchecked, will clearly damage our covenant
community.
The Stated Clerk should make the Constitution accessible
to the church as a living document. The Clerk should support
colleague stated clerks in synods and presbyteries and clerks
of sessions in congregations in upholding the Constitution.
He or she should also offer advisory opinions on the meaning
of the Constitution, provide constitutional advice
to those who seek to faithfully follow its precepts, and enable
the church to adapt the Constitution to new realities
in line with its foundational principles and authoritative interpretations.
The Clerk should manage those processes and institutions, such
as the Advisory Committee on the Constitution and the
Permanent Judicial Commission, that enable the Constitution
to find expression in the church’s life, and provide conferences,
educational materials, and resources (like our new Common Faith,
Common Mission curriculum for church officers) to the church.
These are exactly the steps that my colleagues in the Office
of the General Assembly and I have taken to “preserve
and defend” our Constitution. What we also must
do—and have done—is to respect the separation of
powers that our Constitution provides to different
governing bodies, commissions, and governing body officers.
For a Stated Clerk to attempt to assume the power assigned to
a governing body to carry out a judicial order or to countermand
the decision of a judicial commission will truly lead to
constitutional disorder. Upholding the Constitution
is a shared task among governing bodies. As Stated Clerk, I
have sought to faithfully carry out the responsibilities assigned
to me and to respect the role of other partners in this process.
What do you see as the role of the Stated Clerk in
addressing contentious or confrontational issues?
The apostle Paul admonished the Ephesians “to speak the
truth in love.” As I have been called upon tointervene
in contentious issues to further the witness of the General
Assembly, I have sought diligently to follow that admonition.
Two major contexts exist in which the Clerk is called upon
to address contentious issues—those within the church
where the Clerk is charged to uphold our constitutional standards,
and those in relation to the world where the Clerk is called
upon to share the witness of our General Assembly for God’s
justice and reconciliation.
Within the church, actions are always taken in partnership
with the various governing bodies that together are charged
to uphold our Constitution. A clear example of this is in relation
to the controversy surrounding ordination standards, especially
G-6.0106b in the Book of Order. The Clerk’s role is to
make clear to the whole church that the provisions of G-6.0106b
are “the law of the church,” and unless they are
changed through our constitutional processes, they should be
upheld by all governing bodies. I have done this through direct
communications with all of our governing bodies and through
issuing an advisory opinion on G-6.0106b. I have also issued
advisory opinions distinguishing between constitutionally protected
dissent and forbidden defiance, laying out clear parameters
and processes for upholding ordination standards and carefully
defining the roles of stated clerks in judicial process. Since
presbyteries have primary responsibility for upholding ordination
standards, I have provided training and resources to assist
them in this responsibility. Because administrative review is
the normative Presbyterian way of correcting error, I have also
assisted governing bodies, including the General Assembly, in
developing careful review processes to deal with potential defiance.
At the same time, I have reminded the church of the admonition
in the first chapter of the Rules of Discipline, namely, that
our purpose in taking these actions is not punishment or retribution,
but rather restoration and reconciliation.
As the person charged with communicating the actions of the
General Assembly to the world, the Clerk should share our witness
in a manner that is pastoral, that works in partnership with
other faith communities, and that explains particular actions
in terms of their biblical and theological imperatives. Two
examples might be in order. Because the General Assembly adopted
the Taco Bell boycott and instructed me to further its aims,
I spent time with the farmworkers in the fields (I came to be
known as
“gringo grande!”) to express our church’s
deep pastoral concern for them. I also set up meetings between
the Coalition of Immokolee Workers and the leadership of YUM
Brands (the parent company of Taco Bell) to facilitate face-to-face
negotiations for a just solution. I invited other denominations
to join us in this endeavor, and they have! And I have sought,
along with the able staff of the Presbyterian Hunger Program,
to share with Presbyterians the biblical call for justice for
“the least of our brothers and sisters.”
I have taken a similar approach on global issues, such as the
Middle East. In seeking to further the General Assembly’s
witness related to that region, I have spent time visiting pastorally
with the churches there, working closely with the World and
National Councils of Churches, meeting with presidents of nations
seeking peace, and communicating clearly that political action
by the church is based on profound Christian values and the
furtherance of Christian mission in that part of the world.
Comment on an item of business before this General
Assembly that you are excited about and that you believe will
help the church be faithful to its mission to proclaim the Good
News.
I believe the most substantive item of business before the
216th General Assembly is the preliminary report and recommendation
of the Theological Task Force on Peace, Unity, and Purity of
the Church. At the 213th General Assembly in 2001, Moderator
Syngman Rhee and I called for the General Assembly to create
the Theological Task Force as “a more excellent way”
for the church to address how we might uphold our commitment
to the peace, unity, and purity of the church at a time of deep
disagreements among Presbyterians. This model of bringing together
Presbyterian leaders with divergent convictions to seek the
mind of Christ and to lead the whole church in seeking the peace,
unity, and purity of the church is one that has worked before
in our history and is one that I believe God will use again
to renew us as a church. The Office of the General Assembly
has staffed this task force, and I have a great deal of hope
for its ministry among us.
In their preliminary report to this assembly, the task force
shares with us its journey, as this diverse group of Presbyterians
has studied in depth such issues as Christology, biblical interpretation,
ordination standards, and power. The task force has come, in
the process, to a common assumption that we as Presbyterians
do share “one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of
us all” (Eph. 4:5-6). They report on the excellent videos
and resources they have developed for presbyteries and congregations.
Most
importantly, they share with us their affirmation that the church
does indeed long for peace, unity, and purity, and that the
basis for all three of these cherished values is Jesus Christ
himself.
The task force recommends that every presbytery and session
bring together intentional gatherings of Presbyterians with
diverse theological views to covenant together to discuss this
affirmation and, utilizing the resources of the task force,
to seek ways to further the peace, unity, and purity of the
church.
To me, the most important issue facing the Presbyterian Church
(U.S.A.) today is reconciliation. At the heart of the task force’s
report is, indeed, the urgent call for us to be reconciled to
one another and to God, so that we may, in turn, be God’s
agents of reconciliation in the world. The work of this task
force is one filled with hope that, in the midst of our differences,
we may indeed find our peace, unity, and purity in Christ and
move forward together as the body of Christ. I hope that this
preliminary report and recommendation will not only be adopted
by the 216th General Assembly, but will be lived out with great
enthusiasm and deep commitment in our presbyteries and congregations
for many years to come.
|