Will the divisions of the GAC remain the same or will it be changing?
At the present time the General Assembly Council structure will remain the same: Congregational Ministries, National Ministries, Worldwide Ministries and two support areas. However, in the future the GAC may consider how to align its structure more closely with the four goals of the Mission Work Plan.
How come the name of the Mission Initiative changed and how is it doing? What racial ethnic projects will it support?
The Mission Initiative is doing well! It has raised over $8 million in contributions and pledges toward the two aims: international mission and church growth. The Mission Initiative is still the Mission Initiative but the "tag" Joining Hearts and Hands was added to help make its intent more descriptive. In its history and tradition the Presbyterian Church has demonstrated a true heart for mission, especially international mission service and domestic church development, and its parishioners are active in accomplishing great things in mission especially hands-on work. The Mission Initiative is designed to help ensure those two things continue to maintain equal footing.
The 210th General Assembly (1998) approved a Racial Ethnic and Immigrant Evangelism Church Growth Strategy in which several programs were laid out for growing racial ethnic membership. Mission Initiative dollars will be used to increase the church's capacity to support this strategy, e.g., church development, leadership development, and the translation of vital educational and denominational resources.
What powers does the GAC have? The powers of the General Assembly Council are spelled out in the Book of Order in G-13.0200. In general the GAC's primary responsibilities are to develop and implement the mission directions, goals, objectives and priorities of the church, and to coordinate the work of General Assembly agencies and governing bodies in light of the mission directions and priorities.
Who runs the inside of the shop? Who coordinates or pulls together the work of all six agencies?
The directors of the six General Assembly entities (General Assembly Council, Office of the General Assembly, Board of Pensions, Presbyterian Publishing, Presbyterian Foundation, and the Investment and Loan program) meet regularly to coordinate their work. For the General Assembly Council, a staff leadership team composed of the executive director, deputy executive director, deputy for Mission Support Services, the three ministry division directors, the Coordinator for Middle Governing Body Relations and the Associate Director for Communications meet regularly to coordinate the work of the GAC.
How are people selected to serve on the GAC?
The membership of the GAC is specified in the Organization for Mission , p. 9. Synods and presbyteries work with the General Assembly Nominating Committee (GANC) to recommend GAC members. At any given time 50 presbyteries have representatives serving on the GAC. The sixteen synods all have representatives on the GAC. To find out when your presbytery is eligible to have a GAC member, contact the GANC.
What does it mean for the GAC to "claim its leadership" and first priority to provide programs?
In 2003 the General Assembly Council engaged in a self-assessment. A key issue in the results of the assessment was the need to clarify the GAC's role, particularly in light of biennial assemblies. The GAC worked to reach a common understanding of its role and leadership responsibilities. This understanding is reflected in the 2005-2006 Mission Work Plan. The MWP articulates the GAC's role, vision, and mission, and sets out the mission priorities for the next two years. It was adopted by the 216th General Assembly.
How can we increase unrestricted giving?
Talk about the great things that happen because of unrestricted giving! Here's a sample: international mission personnel, youth and young adult programs, curriculum, women's ministries, and evangelism programs, to name a few. The GAC section of the annual report is a great place to start to learn more about these and other programs, and even more information is available at www.pcusa.org .
Another effort underway with the Communications Office of OGA and GAC's Executive Director's office is a "Dollars and Sense" Web site, the purpose of which is to provide a tool to educate and nurture Presbyterians to better understand the source and spending of mission and per capita dollars. The web site would serve to clarify questions and inspire Presbyterians to respond faithfully in service and giving as we recognize God's call to be at work in the church and the world. Why don't we know about this information? Why don't some churches receive this material?
Every congregation receives a copy of the annual report. Much more information about the mission and ministry of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) can be found at www.pcusa.org . However, there does not seem to be a universal point of entry for communication between the GAC offices and congregations. Most of our mailings to directly to pastors who are often buried under the stacks of "informational" mail they receive. Great information is available on line and we encourage people to seek out information on the Web site.
What impact does each General Assembly have on the budget by making new initiatives?
Each General Assembly considers and approves the mission budget for the General Assembly Council. The budget is a good indicator of mission priorities. An assembly sometimes approves new initiatives and priorities that increase the bottom line of the mission budget. Following the General Assembly, the GAC must decide how to pay for the new initiatives, primarily by making reductions in other programs.
Instead of cutting budgets, what can we do to enrich funds development, building on how professional, fiscally responsible the PC(USA) is, especially in light of corporate corruption?
For the fifth year in a row the audit for the PC(USA) has come back with no comments or exceptions. This is an indication of the quality professional financial management that the church enjoys. A major new funds development effort is the Mission Initiative: Joining Hearts and Hands. Joining Hearts and Hands is raising $40 million for new church development and for mission personnel. The GAC is also examining all of its various funds development efforts-ranging from directed mission support to extra commitment opportunities to special offerings-to learn how to better coordinate these multiple efforts. However, the cornerstone of mission work remains unrestricted shared mission dollars, generously sent by congregations and presbyteries to support the work of the whole church, all around the world.
Why does the church spend about $43 million on WMD and only about $27 million on NMD? What does this mean for our membership and growth?
All of the programs of National Ministries and Worldwide Ministries are important. Some programs benefit from restricted funds. Much of the difference between the budgets of National Ministries and Worldwide Ministries is due to restricted funding. Over $17 million in restricted funding, which comes from special offerings, a major bequest, and designated support for international mission co-workers funds the programs of the Global Service and Witness and People in Mutual Mission program areas. However, a significant portion of the One Great Hour of Sharing offering goes to fund mission in the United States.
What sort of cuts has the PC(USA) made during the economic strife our country has recently taken with the war and all?
Like many congregations and presbyteries, the PC(USA) felt the impact of the economic downturn in recent years. This impact was most evident in decreased giving to the unrestricted portion of the mission budget, shared mission giving. Since 2003, the GAC has reduced its unrestricted budget by over $10 million and eliminated over 100 positions.
Which organization, if any, can help small town presbyteries with financial issues? How? What needs to be done to receive that aid?
The first stop should be your synod. They may be able to help you with some financial assistance, or know of other resources.
What is the distribution of this annual report? Does each congregation get one?
The Annual Report is sent to every GA commissioner, congregation, presbytery and synod office. The other five GA agencies receive copies for mailing. Additional copies are available upon request from PDS. The entire book is also published at www.pcusa.org/annual .
How do we get information out to areas without Web access?
We use U.S. Mail. Also, people can request printed material. We make use of bulk mailings, such as the quarterly Info-Pak to all congregations and quarterly resource mailing to Resource Centers. Presbyterians Today , the denomination's magazine is mailed 10 times a year (subscription required).
Is there a prose summary of the workings of GA staff, one that explains structure and how funds are spent-not in annual report format.
One possible resource, to be available in the fall, is a new brochure "Where Do Your Per Capita and Mission Dollars Go?" Also, the annual booklet on Directed Mission Support, sent to all congregations, will have a pullout center section containing financial information in a narrative form.
Where can we find the MGB Web site?
www.pcusa.org/mgbconnect .
Would GAC consider a makeover of the PCUSA.org website more along the lines of this annual report? The current site is hard to navigate and find stuff. The annual report could be a good site map.
The Web site www.pcusa.org is designed to lead visitors to information through seven major navigation categories: Who We Are, Congregations, News and Events, Ministry and Vocations, Resources/Publications, Giving and Funding and U.S. & World Mission. It was intentional to organize the site along topical interest, not bureaucracy, hoping that this approach would improve the site's usability.
Designing Web navigation to mirror the Church's structure would require visitors to know, for example, that Youth Ministry is managed within the Congregational Ministries Division before they could find that program area's Web site (www.pcusa.org/youthministry).
We're always open, however, to new ideas and suggestions to improve our Web communications.
To present to people in our local congregation a "starting list" of resources that would guide them in exploring books, publications, Web sites, etc, what is the best hand-out of six pages or less?
There is a 4-page insert in the center of the Annual Report that addresses this in a small way.
What is a way we could promote knowledge about these programs in addition to GA?
It is a GA commissioner's responsibility to be an advocate for resources of the Assembly. General Assembly Council members and presbytery and synod staff are also charged with promoting programs and resources. Always seeking to improve the promotion of programs and resources the Office of Communication is establishing a communicator's network to augment and assist the other people listed above.
Will this presentation be available on DVD so that we can take back to the local church, or overheads for low techs?
No, not at this time. Good idea for the future, however!
The acronyms are confusing. How can the common ordinary Presbyterian deal with them?
We do use many acronyms. There is a dictionary of acronyms on our website, and you can find it at www.pcusa.org/gac/acronyms.htm
How has the evaluation of "We Believe" curriculum been done?
"We Believe" is designed to respond to constant feedback from its users. Therefore, the evaluation process is continuous. Some of the ways in which the materials were evaluated initially and continue to be evaluated include feedback from the introductory workshops that took place in 2002, feedback from the POINT (Presbyterians Organized for Nurture and Teaching) network, feedback from training sessions with educators at the annual Association of Christian Education Conferences, field-testing with particular congregations, and telephone surveys with churches placing standing orders. Other methods include on-going surveys-found in back of Teacher Book, churches participating in Marketing's field evaluations, telephone focus groups for particular pieces of the curriculum (one is scheduled for this fall to give evaluation of "So Great a Cloud of Witnesses"). All suggestions are considered for implementation by the editorial and marketing staff teams.
While racial-ethnic churches are growing, while the GA set the goal of racial-ethnic churches should growing to 10 percent and more by 2010, the staff cut and the budget cut of the racial ethnic curriculum seems against this goal. What will the PC(USA) do to deal with this problem? Why was Spanish curriculum discontinued?
Congregational Ministries Publishing along with other GAC offices is committed to providing resources for Hispanic Presbyterians. Resource options for materials in languages other than English continue to increase. The Spanish Language Resource Advisory Group will provide input for resources beginning in September.
What provisions will be made for officer development in light of recent budget cuts?
New materials for church officers are underway with anticipated publication date in 2005. Existing materials available from Congregational Ministries Publishing will be revised and continued until the new resources are available. Additionally leadership materials in this area are available from Bridge/Witherspoon Press, Congregational Ministries Publishing, OGA, and Presbyterian Publishing Corporation.
In addition, the Office of the General Assembly has just published a new resource for church officer training under the title "Common Faith, Common Mission." This resource is available from Presbyterian Distribution Service or downloadable from the OGA Web site.
Why doesn't "We Believe" follow the lectionary?
In the early days of We Believe, the editorial staff was asked to consider certain factors as we developed the proposal. These factors were largely reflective of the response to Covenant People-the church expects these to be addressed in the next curriculum. At the top of the list was "biblical literacy" and running a very close second was "by Presbyterians, for Presbyterians." Next on the list was "easy to use, easy to order," followed by "lectionary-based" and "pay attention to attendance patterns in our churches."
As the editorial staff began its work, we noticed that if we considered attendance patterns, especially during the summer months when many church schools close, strict adherence to a lectionary-based curriculum would impede our first goals of biblical literacy/Reformed identity. The Revised Common Lectionary for the summer months includes important Bible stories such as the Abraham through Joseph saga of Genesis 12-45. The editors believe that to be biblically literate, one ought to know these foundational stories. The summer months also include most of the non-Christmas and Easter portions of the Gospels-parables of the Kingdom, important miracle stories-and significant teachings of Paul that contribute to biblical literacy in a Reformed context. The editorial staff decided to adopt a "lectionary-compatible" or "liturgical year aware" approach to We Believe. This allows for Christ cycle specific texts and stories to form the curriculum for the High Holy Days and festivals of Advent through Pentecost, and at the same time, opens the fall season and the time between Epiphany and Lent for the consideration of some of those texts only treated by the lectionary in the summer.
How many PCUSA congregations are using "We Believe"
To date, 2,977 churches have ordered some component of the We Believe curriculum.
How is the Office of Theology and Worship proposing to help the church in leading worship in new and contemporary ways that engage a younger constituency?
Through a program called "Equipping the Saints" initiated by Presbyterian Publishing Corporation, now in partnership with OGA and Congregational Ministries Publishing, newly ordained clergy receive a set of "basic materials" for ministry. These include:
- The Book of Common Worship
- The Presbyterian Hymnal
- The Book of Order
- A Book of Creeds and Confessions
- The Presbyterian Planning Calendar
- The Mission Yearbook for Prayer and Study
- www.pcusa.org
Will there be more evangelism using mass media?
Plans call for the church to continue to have a media presence, but only on a limited basis because these campaigns are very expensive. The current approach is for the national offices to produce spots that can be used by congregations and/or regional governing bodies in local markets. Given our current resources a national campaign would be cost prohibitive.
What is Jarvie Commonweal Service and how is it related to NMD?
Jarvie Commonweal is a private (church related) organization that provides direct social services to Metropolitan New York older adults of the Protestant faith. Its endowment is maintained by the Presbyterian Foundation and its governing board is appointed by the church.
What is the GAC doing to recruit African American and Hispanic pastors?
The GAC sponsored a Racial Ethnic Clergy Recruitment Task Force that specifically looked at this issue. It analyzed the current situation and in a report released this year made recommendations to the church on ways to improve it. Also, there are many programs throughout the organization that focus on racial ethnic leadership development, both lay and professional.
Please explain rationale for eliminating PW positions when PW gives so much mission money to church and other groups.
While the positions that were eliminated served PW they were also responsible for serving a host of other women's groups. It was determined that expectations for the positions were unrealistic and either more positions needed be added or the current arrangement should be revised. No resources were available to add additional positions and so the decision was made to look at new and innovative ways of providing this kind of support. There was no intent to single PW out in these reductions.
How can the church help Presbyterian college students? Are there loans or scholarships available, or other kinds of awards or sources of aid?
The GAC maintains a program of financial aid for studies in which loans, scholarships and other kinds of aid are made available. For more information consult the financial aid webpage at www.pcusa.org/financialaid .
Does the GAC oversee the publication of Horizons Bible Study?
The Horizons Bible Study is a publication of Presbyterian Women, and while PW is supportive of the church's mission program in many ways its programs are independent of the General Assembly Council. The GAC and PW share a covenantal relationship, and the PW staff subscribes to the church's employment policies and practices through the GAC personnel system.
Could we consider rearranging the letters of the acronym for Worldwide Ministries Division?
The acronym "WMD" is currently not very helpful, but the negative association with destruction may not be long lasting as political discourse changes. Nevertheless, there is a general restlessness about the use of the word "Division" to describe a unit in the church, and this topic will be raised for discussion. The removal of the "D" from the acronym would solve the issue the commissioner raised.
Explain more about Worldwide Ministries—how many countries, how many co-workers?
The total count of mission workers was 463 at the end of 2003. Of these, 85 were Young Adult Volunteers serving for one year. The mission workers were serving in a total of 71 countries. Of course, we are involved in some countries where we don't have mission workers. We have church partners in more than 80 countries.
What percentage of the entire budget is spent on mission in the PC(USA)? What percentage of that is spent on missionaries? Based on the 2004 budget of $124,812,804, the total of the programmatic divisions is $93,679,394 or 75 percent of the total budget. The percentage that is being spent on missionaries out of the programmatic portion of the PC(USA) budget is around 16 percent.
Why has designated giving gone from 30 percent to 70 percent?
The shift in percentages between undesignated and designated percentages is due to mainly to the trend of donors wishing to specify where their dollars go rather than give with no restrictions on use.
Could you define more fully the categories of income on the bottom of page 9?
- Basic Mission Support: Shared Mission Support, Directed Mission Support
- Churchwide Special Offerings: Christmas Joy, One Great Hour of Sharing, Peacemaking, Pentecost
- Other Specific Appeals: Emergency and Disaster Relief, Extra Commitment, Mission Initiative-Joining Hearts and Hands, Hunger, Theological Education Fund
- Additional Forms of Giving: Presbyterian Women, Bequests & Annuities (Unrestricted), Other Gifts, Validated Mission Support, Grants from Outside Foundations
- Interest and Dividends: PC(USA) Restricted Endowments, PC(USA) Unrestricted Endowments, Presbyterian Mission Program, Outside Trusts, Jarvie Commonweal Fund, Jinishian, Short Term Investments
- Conference Centers, Curriculum, & Programs Services: Conference Center Operating Receipts, Partner Churches And Other, Sales: Curriculum, Program Services, Resources, Per Capita Funds
What exactly is "related mission funding?" and what does the money for the executive director's office go towards?
Related Mission Funding reflects allocations made to area of other elated entities and overall mission functions of the General Assembly Mission Program. These allocations do not relate in anyway to the budget of the General Assembly Council programs. Examples to Related Mission Funding would be the Board of Pensions, Presbyterian Church Foundations, Allocations to Middle Governing Bodies (these are allocations from Restricted Endowments based on recommendations from the Restricted Endowment Funds Oversight Committee).
I am concerned about the 5 percent/1 percent "contribution" on designated giving. I would hope that the GAC would not implement this, but would find a better way to help fund mission.
Long term, the GAC is committed to looking for a better way. The GAC, in its Mission Work Plan, is committed to examining the entire mission funding system. The current funding system is causing financial stress to the General Assembly Council, as well as to many, if not most, presbyteries and synods. This stress, in part, rises from a mission funding system that has been patched and repaired over decades and is no longer relevant or responsive to the needs today.
In the meantime, however, the GAC is facing severe financial pressures. While administering a 5 percent /1 percent contribution on designated giving is not perfect, shared mission cost allocation does attempt to bring equity to sharing the cost of all expenses incurred to support the mission and ministry done through the GAC on behalf of the church. |