| |
Overture 22
On Adding a New Section D-2.0104 Outlining a
Process to Handle Frivolous Complaints—From the Presbytery
of National Capital.
The Presbytery of National Capital overtures
the 217th General Assembly (2006) to direct the Stated Clerk
to send the following proposed amendment to the presbyteries
for their affirmative or negative vote:
Shall a new section D-2.0104 be added, to
read as follows:
“An investigating committee
or permanent judicial commission, in order to ensure that the
judicial process is not abused, must, in every case other than
an allegation of sexual abuse, determine whether the complainant
or accuser has complied with D-1.0103. If there is no evidence
of purposeful compliance, and if there is evidence of bad faith
or reckless disregard by the complainant or accuser, the investigating
committee or permanent judicial commission can, at its discretion,
declare the accusation or complaint to be frivolous, and such
finding shall be publicly disclosed. If the investigating committee
or permanent judicial commission declares the accusation or
complaint to be frivolous, it can, at its discretion, preclude
the accuser or complainant from access to judicial process within
the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), except for an allegation of
sexual abuse, for a period of up to one year.”
Rationale
The Rules of Discipline are intended for “building
up the body of Christ, not for destroying it, for redeeming,
not for punishing” (D-1.0102). Use of judicial process
to advance personal or political agendas, or to “punish”
positions, statements, or actions that the accuser or complainant
disagrees with, undermines and eviscerates the Rules of Discipline.
In addition, use of the judicial process to advance frivolous
complaints imposes unnecessary costs, both in terms of money
and persons, upon the governing body processing the complaint.
This new section to the Rules of Discipline would provide a
means to ensure that the rules are not abused.
|
|