Overture 32
On Amending D-14.0600, Control of Materials During
Pre-Trial Phase—From the Presbytery of National Capital.
The Presbytery of National Capital overtures
the 217th General Assembly (2006) to direct the
Stated Clerk to send the following amendment to the presbyteries
for their affirmative or negative votes:
Shall a new section, “D-14.0600,”
be added to the Rules of Discipline to read as follows:
“D-14.0600 6. Control of Materials
During Pretrial Phase
“Documents, depositions, briefs,
correspondence, memoranda, transcripts, and any other materials
prepared or produced during the pretrial phase of a judicial
proceeding may not be used for any purpose other than the judicial
proceeding without the prior review and approval of the moderator
and clerk of the permanent judicial commission.”
Rationale
During the pretrial phase of a complaint or
appeal, a permanent judicial committee (PJC) may
request or require various documents and other materials to
be produced or prepared for its use in reaching a ruling and
decision.
The PJC leadership may itself prepare various
materials including memoranda, rulings, and supporting argument
during the pretrial phase of a judicial proceeding.
Being a commission, a PJC may bring the full
authority of its parent governing body to bear on parties and
members of the PC(USA) to encourage or compel the production
or preparation of such materials.
The purpose of the PJC in taking such action
is to assist and enable it in fulfilling its constitutional
responsibilities.
The parties or other affected persons have
a reasonable expectation that these materials will be used by
the PJC, and not for other purposes.
It would be an abuse of the judicial process
for a party to cause a PJC to employ its authority for the production
or preparation of such materials with the hidden intention of
then using those materials for other purposes.
During the pretrial phase, the moderator and
clerk of a PJC have an affirmative responsibility to protect
the interests of all parties as well as of members and officers
of the PC(USA) who may be involved in producing or preparing
such materials.
The interest of the public to view such materials,
while very important, is only one of a number of competing interests
that should be weighed by a PJC in deciding what other uses,
if any, might be appropriate and allowable under the circumstances.
The Rules of Discipline are currently
silent on the question of whether other use of such materials
requires prior review and approval by the PJC leadership.
|