Overture 67
On Amending the Book of Order to Provide
Flexibility in Presbytery and Synod Membership—From the
Presbytery of Beaver-Butler.
The Presbytery of Beaver-Butler
overtures the 217th General Assembly (2006) to direct the Stated
Clerk to send the following proposed amendments to the presbyteries
for their affirmative or negative votes:
1. Shall G-11.0101 be amended as follows:
[Text to be deleted is shown with a strike-through; text to
be added or inserted is shown as italic.]
“Presbytery is a corporate expression
of the church consisting of all the churches and ministers
of the Word and Sacrament within a certain district
who have chosen to affiliate based on geographic, theological,
missional, or other considerations of importance to those
congregations. When a presbytery meets, each church shall
be represented by an elderb
commissioned by the session with the following additional
provisions:”
2. Shall G-11.0103j be deleted and current
G-11.0103k-aa be re-lettered as G-11.0103j-z. [Text to be deleted
is shown with a strike-through.]
“j. to control the location of
new churches and of churches desiring to move;
3. Shall a new section “G-11.0600”
be added to read as follows:
“G-11.0600 Changes in Membership
“a. Congregations may choose membership
in a particular presbytery based on geographic, theological,
missional, or other considerations of importance to those
congregations.
“b. A congregation may seek to
change presbytery membership by a two-thirds vote at a properly
called congregational meeting.
“c. The receiving presbytery will
accept the congregation’s request for membership by
a majority vote at a properly called presbytery meeting.
“d. The minister(s) of Word and
Sacrament of the joining congregation become members of the
receiving presbytery when it is determined by the committee
on ministry of the receiving presbytery that their call is
in order (G-14.0506-.0507).”
4. Shall G-12.0101 be amended to read as follows:
[Text to be deleted is shown with a strike-through; text to
be added or inserted is shown as italic.]
“Synod is the unit of the church’s
life and mission which consists of not fewer than
three presbyteries within a specific geographic region
who choose to affiliate based on geographic, theological,
missional, or other considerations of importance to those
presbyteries. When a synod meets it shall be composed
of commissioners elected by the presbyteries. The synod shall
determine, with the consent of a majority of its presbyteries,
the basis of election and the ratio of commissioners to members
represented in the presbyteries, as well as its method to
fulfill the principles of participation and representation
found in G 9.0104 and G 9.0105. The commissioners from each
presbytery shall be divided equally between elders and ministers
of the Word and Sacrament. Each person elected moderator shall
be enrolled as a member of the synod until a successor is
elected and installed, and then shall be enrolled as a corresponding
member of the synod.”
5. Shall G-12.0102k be amended by striking
the current text and inserting new text to read as follows:
“k. to organize new presbyteries,
to divide, unite, or otherwise combine presbyteries or portions
of presbyteries previously existing, and, with the concurrence
of existing presbyteries, to create nongeographic presbyteries
in order to meet the mission needs (G-11.0103a; G-12.0102a)
of identified racial ethnic or immigrant congregations; subject
to the approval of the General Assembly. Such presbyteries
shall be formed in compliance with the requirements of G-7.0201
and G-11.0102 and be accountable to the synod within which
they were created. To vote to receive, by majority
vote, existing and new presbyteries that have petitioned for
synod membership (G-12.0307).”
6. Shall a new section “G-12.0400”
be added to read as follows:
“G-12.0400 Changes in Membership
“a. A presbytery may seek membership
in a particular synod based on geographic, theological, missional,
or other considerations of importance to that presbytery.
“b. A presbytery may seek to change
synod membership by a two-thirds vote at a properly called
presbytery meeting.
“c. The receiving synod will accept
the presbytery request for membership by a majority vote at
a properly called synod meeting.
“d. New presbyteries shall be formed
when not fewer than twelve congregations petition a synod
for the creation of a presbytery of which they will become
member congregations. New presbyteries shall be created by
a two-thirds vote of the synod at a properly called meeting."
7. Shall G-13.0103m be stricken and new text
inserted so that it shall read as follows: [Text to be deleted
is shown with a strike-through; text to be added or inserted
is shown as italic.]
“m. to organize new synods and
to divide, unite, or otherwise combine synods or portions
of synods previously existing to provide for the creation
of new synods. New synods shall be formed when not fewer than
three presbyteries petition the General Assembly for the creation
of a synod of which they will become member presbyteries.
New synods shall be created by a two-thirds vote of the General
Assembly at a regularly called meeting.”
8. Shall G-13.0103n-x be amended so that it
shall read as follows: [Text to be deleted is shown with a strike-through;
text to be added or inserted is shown as italic.]
“n. to approve the organization,
division, uniting, or combining of presbyteries or portions
of presbyteries by synods;
“o. n. to serve in judicial
matters in accordance with the Rules of Discipline;
“p. to warn or bear witness against
error in doctrine or immorality in practice in or outside
the church;
“q. o. to decide controversies
brought before it and to give advice and instruction in cases
submitted to it, in conformity with the Constitution;
“r. p. to provide authoritative
interpretation of the Book of Order which shall be binding
on the governing bodies of the church when rendered in accord
with G 13.0112 or through a decision of the Permanent Judicial
Commission in a remedial or disciplinary case. The most recent
interpretation of a provision of the Book of Order shall be
binding;
“s. q. to establish
and maintain those ecumenical relationships that will enlarge
the life and mission of the church;
“t. r. to correspond
with other churches;
“u. s. to receive under
its jurisdiction, with the consent of two thirds of the presbyteries,
other ecclesiastical bodies whose life is consistent with
the faith and order of this church;
“v. t. to authorize
synods to exercise similar power in receiving ecclesiastical
bodies suited to become constituents of those governing
bodies and lying within their geographic bounds constituents
of those governing bodies;
“w. u. to unite with
other churches in accordance with the procedures set forth
in this Constitution. (G-15.0300)
“x. v. to review the
work of the Office of the General Assembly in consultation
with the Stated Clerk of the General Assembly.”
9. Shall G-8.0401 be amended by adding the
following paragraphs to read as follows:
“a. Any presbytery that chooses to
withdraw from the denomination shall forfeit all real property
to synod.
“b. Any synod that chooses to withdraw
from the denomination shall forfeit all real property to the
General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.).”
Rationale
Make the changes to the Form of Government
that will honor the spirit of the Report of the Task Force
on Peace, Unity, and Purity of the Church. These changes will
accommodate the diverse belief systems, theological positions,
and mission designs that currently exist within the Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.) and will encourage the kind of “flexible
equilibrium” to which the task force calls the church
(lines 807-808, Final Report of the Task Force on Peace, Unity,
and Purity of the Church).
The 213th General Assembly (2001) directed
the Moderators of the 213th, 212th, and the 211th General Assemblies
(2001), (2000), and (199) to appoint a theological task force
reflecting the theological and cultural diversity of the church
to “lead the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) in spiritual
discernment of our Christian identity, in and for the 21st century.
. . . This discernment shall include but not be limited to issues
of Christology, biblical authority and interpretation, ordination
standards and power” (Minutes, 2001, Part I, p.
29). One significant outcome from the task force involves allowing
presbyteries and synods a certain amount of latitude (what the
report calls flexible equilibrium [lines 918-19] ) in matters
of polity.
“Our faith is in the God of Israel who
raised Jesus Christ bodily from the dead. This is the one faith
confessed by the people of God: ‘one Lord, one faith,
one God and Father of all, who is above all and through all
and in all’ (Eph. 4:5-6)” (Theological Task Force
on the Peace, Unity, and Purity of the Church final report,
lines 51-53).
“It is by following Jesus Christ, as
attested for us in Scripture, that the unity of our faith will
be made visible today as it has in the past” (Ibid, lines
58-60).
Jesus Christ alone is head of the church.
Jesus alone is the source of the church’s unity.
Section G-1.0100c affirms that: “Christ
gives to his Church its faith and life, its unity and mission,
its officers and ordinances.” The task force final report
reminds us that our unity is rooted in Christ and that the church’s
purity does not spring from “technical or legal means,”
but from Jesus Christ. Attempting to keep the church unified
and pure without providing freedom for Christ’s Spirit
to move is not helpful.
Section G-1.0301(1)(a) affirms that: “...
‘God alone is Lord of the conscience, and hath left it
free from the doctrines and commandments of men which are in
anything contrary to his Word, or beside it, in matters of faith
or worship.’” Flexibility in presbytery and synod
membership provides options for theological and missional partnerships
not possible under the rigid geographical criteria that worked
well in other times.
Section G-3.0401d affirms that God is calling
us “to a new openness to God’s continuing reformation
of the Church ecumenical, that it might be a more effective
instrument of mission in the world.” The task force points
out that “there are many signs that, on a changing cultural
landscape, old models are breaking down and new forms of denominationalism
in the United States are developing at local, regional, and
national levels” (lines 905-907). These new forms cannot
emerge from strict adherence to existing structures; they must
be permitted and nurtured by a denomination willing to seek
flexibility and equilibrium.
The intended purpose of flexible equilibrium
in presbytery and synod membership is to provide safe opportunity
for congregations and judicatories to express shared, deeply
held convictions. To seek flexibility regarding essential belief,
as the task force does, without providing a corresponding freedom
of association based on those very convictions is contradictory
and ultimately self-defeating.
Under a more flexible system of presbytery
and synod membership, the power of the upper judicatories is
diminished (for example, in discipline and enforcement) and
that of lower judicatories (congregations and presbyteries)
increases.
A flexible plan of presbytery and synod membership provides
an affirmation of the missional church’s understanding
of non-hierarchal structures and ministries. It affirms the
congregation as the primary agent of mission and ministry and
the presbytery as secondary agent for the support, encouragement,
and accountability of congregations and pastors. Any other judicatories
are tertiary agents for the support, encouragement, and accountability
of the presbytery.
Allowing congregations flexibility in their
presbytery membership, and presbyteries in their synods membership,
provides the basis for mission and ministry under a generous
and broad orthodox creedal Reformed Christianity. Membership
flexibility acknowledges the current era of diverse styles and
forms while maintaining the historic unity of the church.
Competing factions within the Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.) appeal to “Historic Presbyterianism.”
Flexible equilibrium is, by contrast, future-oriented while
at the same time providing an affirmation of “Presbyterianism”
in its connectional-accountable sense. It acknowledges the need
for one another while rejecting both institutional coercion
and radical ecclesiastical autonomy.
A flexible plan for presbytery and synod membership
allows congregations and judicatories to work for reformation
and renewal in local congregations and in presbyteries only
as they serve the local congregation. This flexibility allows
the denomination to focus on positive change rather than defensive
battles.
For these reasons, we urge the 217th General
Assembly (2006) to approve this overture.
|