Legal Resource Manual
PC(USA) Seal
 
 
 
Taxation
 
The material in this Taxation chapter deals with various federal taxation issues, such as these:
  • Federal Taxation of Ministers (income and self-employment, i.e., Social Security)
  • Group Federal 501(c)(3) Tax Exemption
  • Unrelated Business Taxable Income
  • Substantiating and Reporting Charitable Contributions
Some state-related tax issues are also discussed.

Throughout this chapter and the entire Legal Manual generally, you will see references to Richard Hammar's Church & Clergy Tax Guide (Hammar's Tax Guide. This is a useful resource we highly recommend. It is written for nonlawyers and lawyers alike. It is updated each year to include the latest changes in the federal law. If you want more detailed information regarding the subjects discussed in this section, we advise you to consult Hammar's Tax Guide. In addition, you may wish to share it with your attorney, accountant, or tax provider. For copies call (800)222-1840 or visit the "Bookstore" at ChurchLawToday.com. Copies are $17.95 each.

 
 
 
 
PC(USA) Polity Reflections Note #24
Jannuary 26, 1999
 
Polity Reflection notes reflect the advice of the Constitutional Services Department of OGA, but do not constitute rulings or authoritative interpretations. This is a read-only note. Please submit comments to PCUSA POLITY DISCUSSION.

Re: Tax Status for Commissioned Lay Pastors (hereafter CLPs)

Right before Christmas the United Methodist Church (hereafter UMC) received their long awaited "Revenue Ruling" from the IRS relating to the UMC lay pastor's tax status and the news is good for Presbyterian CLPs.

Before relating the details and our Constitutional Services analysis it is helpful to review what a Revenue Ruling is. Strictly speaking only the individual taxpayer asking the question may rely on the Ruling. This particular ruling, dated December 10, 1998, contains the usual language regarding the ruling's precedential value. But with those caveats, it is very common for taxpayers and tax advisers to rely on private letter rulings because they tend to be good indicators of how the IRS would respond in an audit or tax proceeding on that particular issue. This particular ruling relies heavily on previous tax court cases, so it is reasonable to believe that the IRS will apply the analysis and standards described in this ruling to similar situations in the future. That being said:

The United Methodist Polity has a clergy classification with substantially similar authority, responsibility, and training as is now permitted our CLPs under the new provisions of G-14.0801. Like PCUSA CLPs, the UMC deacons are ordained officers. Like PCUSA CLPs, UMC deacons are permitted to teach, preach, administer the sacraments, perform weddings and funerals, and have voice and vote in the Regional Conference (which is roughly equivalent to a PCUSA presbytery). Such deacons can serve on committees and boards of the Conference.

The IRS determined that a deacon would be treated as a "Minister of the Gospel" for purposes of section 1402(c)-5(b)(2) of the IRS Code. The factors the Revenue Ruling explicitly cites as significant in making the evaluation were:

  • That the taxpayer was ordained by the Church
  • That the taxpayer had authority to conduct worship
  • That the taxpayer had authority to assist with (administer) the Sacraments
  • That the taxpayer had authority to perform weddings and funerals
  • That the taxpayer was a member of the Conference

It was important to the IRS that the taxpayers in question had been given authority to do "substantially all" those functions.

If a presbytery granted all the authority now possible under G-14.0801c, a CLP could:

  • Administer the Lord's Supper
  • Administer the Sacrament of Baptism
  • Moderate the Session under the supervision of moderator
  • Have a voice in meetings of Presbytery
  • Have a vote in meetings of Presbytery
  • Perform a service of Christian Marriage

W.4.10000 does not explicitly require that a Minister of Word and Sacrament preside at a funeral, but rather only suggests the service will take place "under the direction of the pastor." So CLPs can surely preside at funerals.

Those grants of authority are almost parallel with the factors listed in the Revenue Ruling. Therefore we believe that if a presbytery, in fact, grants the authority in all six areas, the CLP could be treated as a "Minister of the Gospel" for purposes of Federal Income Taxes.

This will necessitate some changes in terms of compensation for those CLPs who wish such tax treatment.

Treatment as a Minister of the Gospel:

  • allows the taxpayer to exclude (for federal income tax purposes, but not for Social Security) the fair rental value of church owned manses or housing allowances for housing provided to the taxpayer
  • treats the taxpayer as self-employed for Social Security Purposes (so the CLP will have the "privilege" of paying both portions of Social Security Tax)
  • exempts CLP wages from any tax withholding (so the CLP will need to make quarterly payments for that income or adopt a voluntary withholding plan)

This Revenue Ruling may allow some congregations (especially rural ones owning manses and having meager resources) to provide "more" real income without additional dollars being paid out by the congregation.

Congregations wishing to take advantage of this Ruling will need to vote the compensation for the CLP in very much the same way such sessions vote on changes in compensation for temporary ministers. It is likely too late to make such a determination for January of 1999 (since compensation has likely already been paid out for January), but quick action may allow some CLPs to benefit for the additional 11 months this year.

We have provided a copy of this Revenue Ruling to each of the presbyteries. We urge any congregations or CLPs who wish to seek tax treatment as a Minister of the Gospel to obtain a copy of the Ruling and evaluate their own situation with the assistance of a tax adviser.

  Link to Top of Page
 
PC(USA) Polity Reflections Note #69
September 9, 1992
 
Re: Minister Employer, G-14.0501
 
There are at least three possible answers to the question of who is the employer of a Presbyterian church pastor. Although many ministers are uncomfortable using secular terminology to describe their working relationships, it is assumed in this paper that one uses secular categories in responding to lawsuits in secular courts.

Some ministers would argue that in secular terms a minister of Word and Sacrament is a self-employed professional. This is how ministers are considered for purposes of the Self-employment Contributions Act and of Federal income tax withholding. It is also consistent with some theological doctrine of the minister's call and accountability to Jesus Christ. The minister, in this view, is a completely free agent, and therefore there is no employer to be held liable for the minister's actions.

The Reformed doctrine of the minister generally, and the provisions of the Book of Order at G-6.0201 and throughout, exclude this notion of the minister as a free agent. The work of a Presbyterian minister must be carried out in accountability to the presbytery and to organizations, agencies, and institutions, G-11.0403d, and when the minister serves a congregation, to the session.

The presbytery has responsibility and power to ordain, receive, dismiss, install, remove, and discipline ministers, G-11.0103n. Acting as a whole or through its committee the presbytery examines ministers, G-11.0402, advises congregations regarding any candidate or minister whose name is contemplated for nomination to the congregation, G-11.0502d, and approves the calls of ministers to their positions, G-11.0103n.

The minister is a member of the presbytery and is subject to review by the presbytery according to criteria established by the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), G-11.0403. In addition, the presbytery has a responsibility to visit sessions and inquire into the mission and ministry of the congregation, and to intervene in disputes between ministers and churches, G-11.0502.

Due to these functions by the presbytery neither the session nor congregation has complete authority to hire and fire. For these reasons, it could be argued that the presbytery is the employer of the minister. More will be said about the relation of the presbytery to the session and the minister following discussion of the session and minister.

The third possibility, which is the advice being given here, is that the session is the employer of the pastor and other ministers on the church staff.

The Internal Revenue Service uses a "common law employee test" to determine whether sufficient control is present to establish an employer-employee relationship. Descriptions of this test as applied to ministers are found in Abingdon Clergy Income Tax Guide (Abingdon Press), and Church and Clergy Tax Guide (Christian Ministry Resources). The question there is whether the minister is to report income as an employee or as self-employed.

This test is also useful for considering who is the employer of a Presbyterian pastor. The factors are not all equally applicable to the relationship of minister, session, and presbytery.

Ignoring for this purpose certain distinctions among session, congregation, and trustees, such as the election of the minister by the congregation, the most significant factors are:

The minister does not own and control the workplace and its furnishings and equipment.

Although the minister determines the content of preaching and teaching, the session makes all major program decisions and schedules the times facilities are available.

The session determines the personnel policies and job descriptions of staff. The authority of the pastor to hire and fire others exists only by delegation from the session and may be very limited.

The minister generally works exclusively for one or two congregations, is paid a salary and expenses, and is not continually marketing professional services to an unlimited clientele.

Although sessions are typically lax in requiring detailed reports of the pastor's work, there is no question that reports may be required. Relationship of the pastor and session in all areas of the congregation's worship, program, and pastoral care is a continuing exchange.

Means and methods are not precisely controlled as in assembly line work, but the use of the minister's time in leading worship, teaching, visiting, counseling, and community service is subject to evaluation by the session if the session chooses to do it.

The relationship of the presbytery in all of these areas is one of providing consultation and guidance, and ultimately, of dispute resolution with a right to intervene. The presbytery is not continually involved in the administration and supervision of ministerial personnel, and under G-11.0103s of the Book of Order, is not permitted to intervene in the powers of the session without good cause.

On this analysis, the session's responsibility for the mission and government of the particular church, G-10.0102, makes it, for secular law purposes, in the day-to-day work of the church, the employer of the pastor and other ministers. The presbytery's relationship of oversight and evaluation of both the minister and the session makes it a partner with them.

  Link to Top of Page
 
Private Letter Ruling Regarding Methodist Deacons
 
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Refer Reply to:
CC:EBEO:2 PLR 115424-97
Index No: 0107.00-00
Date: Dec. 10, 1998
 
This is in response to your August 13, 1997, request for a private letter ruling submitted on behalf of X. Additional information was submitted on November 6, 1997, March 31, 1998, and August 3, 1998. A conference was held on February 24, 1998.

Facts

The Church is a well-established worldwide Christian denomination that is organized pursuant to the tenets, social principles, constitutional provisions, and legislative enactments contained in its Governing Document. The Governing Document is the fundamental book outlining the law, doctrine, administration and organization, work and procedures of the Church. The Church operates via a connectional structure maintained through a chain of conferences. The highest level of authority is the National Conference, which meets quadrennially to discuss issues of concern to the Church. The National Conference is comprised of one-half laypersons and one-half members of the clergy. Generally, each National Conference amends the Governing Document, and those amendments are reflected in the quadrennial revision of the Governing Document. Although subject to certain restrictions, the National Conference has the full authority, among other things, to define and fix the powers and duties of the members of the ordained clergy of the Church, and the Governing Document includes the rules applicable to ordained members of the clergy.

The basic organizational bodies of the Church are the Regional Conferences. Each Regional Conference within the United States includes the local churches of the Church within specific geographic boundaries. The membership in each Regional Conference includes clergy, laypersons, and diaconal ministers. Clergy members in the Regional Conferences include ordained deacons and ordained elders. Only clergy members in full connection are allowed to vote on matters relating to the ordination, characte,r and conference relations of the members of the clergy.

At its Date G gathering, the National Conference voted to establish the order of ordained deacons and the Governing Document was amended accordingly. Proposals to establish an order of ordained deacons had been made to the National Conference at the three preceding quadrennial gatherings. Thus, the decision to establish an order of deacons was made after the Church spent more than twenty years studying its ministry. Hence, after Date G and individual may be ordained as either a deacon or an elder. As permitted by the Governing Document, both elders and deacons are ordained as clergy members in full connection. Prior to establishment of the order of ordained deacon, elders were the only ordained members of the clergy.

The Church defines ordination as the act of conferring ministerial orders. In accordance with Church traditions, an ordained minister is a baptized person who is called by God, authorized by the Church, and ordained by a bishop to a lifetime ministry. To qualify for ordination as either a deacon or an elder, an individual must meet the requirements set by the Church that are specified in the Governing Document. In addition, to be ordained, the individual must be recommended by the Regional Conference and receive the affirmative vote of the ministerial members of the Regional Conference. Through ordination the ordained individual is given the approval of the denomination to serve as an ordained minister and the authority to carry out those acts reserved to members of the clergy. Thus, following ordination, the ordained elder or deacon has the authority to exercise the responsibilities and duties of an ordained minister.

According to the Governing Document, an ordained deacon is permitted to give leadership in teaching and proclaiming the gospel, forming and nurturing disciples, performing marriages and funerals, and assisting the elder in administering the sacraments. An ordained deacon has full right of voice and vote in the Regional Conference where membership is held, may serve or hold office as a member of the clergy on the boards, commissions, or committees of the Regional Conference, may be elected as a clergy delegate to the National Conference, must attend all sessions of the Regional Conference, and with the elder is responsible for all matters of ordination, character, and conference relations with members of the clergy. An ordained deacon is accountable to his or her Regional Conference and the bishop for the fulfillment of his or her call. An ordained elder is appointed to a position by a bishop. However, unlike an elder, an ordained deacon does not itinerate, nor does the Church guarantee an ordained deacon a position, salary, or place of employment. Ordained deacons are permitted to participate in the Church retirement plan for members of the clergy.

When it established the order of ordained deacons, the National Conference amended the Governing Document to include transitional rules that would allow certain "diaconal ministers" to become ordained deacons. A diaconal minister is a layperson who was consecrated by a bishop, but who the Church does not treat or consider as a member of the clergy. The Church expects that some, but not all of its diaconal ministers will become ordained deacons. The transitional rules are available for a limited period and provide that a diaconal minister in good standing with his or her Regional Conference who has completed a minimum of three years in an approved service appointment may be ordained as a deacon provided he or she meets the following requirements:

  1. Apply in writing to the Regional Conference for transfer of credentials to ordained deacon in full connection;
  2. Complete the formation and education program sponsored by the Board;
  3. Demonstrate an understanding of the call to the order of deacon and a ministry that fulfills and exemplifies the definition and description of deacon found in the Governing Document;
  4. Satisfy specific educational requirements; and
  5. Receive a two-thirds positive vote of the clergy session of the Regional Conference.

X, a local Church, founded in 1840, is located in City and is in the State Conference. X has more than 1,000 members and employs more than fifty employees; including three ordained deacons, C, D, and E. C, D, and E were ordained pursuant to the transitional rules. X requested rulings that C, D, and E are ministers of the gospel and that the duties they perform are ordinarily the duties of a minister of the gospel under section 107 of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). X also requested rulings that C, D, and E are ministers performing services in the exercise of their ministry for purposes of sections 1402(c)(4) and 3121(b)(8)(A).1

X has represented the following facts concerning C, D, and E and the duties they perform for X:

As ordained deacons, C, D, and E are expected to comply with the applicable provisions of the Governing Document. C is the Minister of Education; D is the Minister of Music; and E is the Minister of Stewardship. As integral members of X’s pastoral team, C, D, and E meet with the elder to plan the worship services, assist with the sacraments, and officiate at weddings and funerals. Each is required to preach at Sunday worship service.

C's primary duties relate to the Christian education program. C plans and supervises youth, adult, and family activities, including Sunday education classes, Bible study, and various educational programs sponsored by X. C selects the curriculum, schedules activities, and when needed, coordinates lay volunteers. C also assists the X school to develop appropriate educational opportunities. D, the Minister of Music, coordinates all choir and music activities. E performs financial and managerial functions. His primary function is to encourage members of the congregation to give their time, talent, and money to X and the community. When not leading worship services, C, D, and E participate with the pastor in the weekly worship service. They also perform various other duties at X, including confirmation preparation and membership reception.

X's August 3, 1998, submission specifies how each met the transitional requirements needed to be ordained as a deacon. Each timely applied to the State Conference Board to transfer his or her credentials to ordained deacon. Each was in good standing as a diaconal minister and had completed at least three years in a service appointment approved by the bishop since consecration as a diaconal minister. Each completed the continuing formation and education program sponsored by the Board and satisfied the applicable educational requirements. C and D have bachelor's degrees and have completed graduate theological courses as required by the State Conference. E has a master's degree in theology studies. Each demonstrated an understanding of the call to the order of deacon and received the full support of the State Conference Board of Ordained Clergy and was passed on to the State Conference for final vote of confirmation. Each received the required two-thirds or greater positive vote of the clergy session of State Conference. C, D, and E were ordained as deacons on Date H.

Applicable Law

Section 61(a) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided, gross income means all income from whatever source derived; including compensation for services including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items.

Section 107 of the Code provides that in the case of a minister of the gospel, gross income does not include the rental value of a home furnished to the minister as a part of the minister’s compensation or the rental allowance paid to the minister as part of the minister’s compensation, to the extent used by the minister to rent or provide a home.

Sections 1402(c)(4) and 3121(b)(8)(A) of the Code, which provide definitions for purposes of the Self-Employment Contributions Act taxes and the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax respectively, refer to services performed by a “duly ordained, commissioned, or licensed minister” of a church in the exercise of his ministry.

Section 1.107-1(a) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that in order to qualify for the exclusion provided by section 107, the home or rental allowance must be provided as remuneration for services that are ordinarily the duties of a minister of the gospel. In general, the rules provided in regulation section 1.1402(c)-5 apply to that determination. Regulation section 1.107-1(a) also provides that the performance of sacerdotal functions, the conduct of religious worship, the administration and maintenance of religious organizations and their integral agencies, and the performance of teaching and administrative functions at theological seminaries will be considered the duties of a minister for purposes of section 107.

Section 1.1402(c)-5(a)(2) of the regulations provides that a “duly ordained, commissioned, or licensed minister” of a church is engaged in carrying on a trade or business with respect to service performed by him in the exercise of his ministry or in the exercise of duties required by a religious order unless an exemption under section 1402(e) of the Code is effective. Section 1.1402(c)-5(b)(2) provides that service performed by a minister in the exercise of his ministry includes the ministration of sacerdotal functions and the conduct of religious worship, and the control, conduct, and maintenance of religious organizations (including the religious boards, societies, and other integral agencies of such organizations) under the authority of a religious body constituting a church or church denomination. Section 1.1402(c)-5(b)(2)(i) provides that whether service performed by a minister constitutes the conduct of religious worship or the ministration of sacerdotal functions depends on the tenets and practices of the particular religious body constituting the minister's church or church denomination. Section 31.3121(b)(8)-1 has a similar provision.

If a church or church denomination ordains some ministers of the gospel and licenses or commissions others, the licensed or commissioned minister must perform substantially all the religious functions within the scope of the tenets and practices of his religious denomination to be treated as a “minister of the gospel” under section 107 of the Code. Rev. Rul. 78-301, 1978-2 C.B. 103. The Service ruled in Rev. Rul. 59-270, 1959-2 C.B. 44, that neither a minister of music nor a minister of education was entitled to an exclusion under section 107 when neither one was an ordained minister of the gospel, although both were performing services relating to the office and functions of a minister of the gospel. The facts of the ruling specify that neither minister was licensed, ordained, or commissioned.

In Wingo v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 922 (1989), the Tax Court considered whether the taxpayer, a probationary member of the North Arkansas Annual Conference of The United Methodist Church (the Conference), who was both an ordained deacon and a licensed local pastor, was performing services as a duly ordained, commissioned or licensed minister for purposes of the self-employment tax exemption available under section 1402(e) of the Code. Taxpayer administered the Sacraments, conducted worship and performed services in the control, conduct, and maintenance of his local church and Conference. The court held that the taxpayer was a duly ordained, commissioned, or licensed minister within the meaning of section 1402 when he assumed the duties and functions of a minister in 1980. In analyzing whether the taxpayer was a duly ordained, commissioned, or licensed minister, the court examined whether taxpayer performed the duties and functions of a minister within the three types of ministerial services specified in section 1.1402(c)-5(b)(2) of the regulations, whether the taxpayer was ordained, commissioned, or licensed, and whether his church considered him to be a religious leader.

The court held that the taxpayer was a minister because he satisfied all the elements of section 1.1402(c)-5(b)(2) of the regulations. As a local pastor and an ordained deacon, he administered the sacraments and conducted religious worship. The court also found that he satisfied the third prong (control, conduct, and maintenance of the church or religious organizations within the church) because he was in charge of all the organizational concerns of his own congregation, including administering the provision of the church discipline, supervising the working program of the local church, maintaining church records and meeting local financial obligations. The court noted that a church’s designation of an individual as a minister standing alone, is insufficient to determine whether the individual is a minister for self-employment tax purposes; however, it is an additional factor to consider. The court concluded that when a person performs all the three types of services set forth in the regulations and is recognized as a minister or religious leader by his denomination that person is a minister for purposes of section 1402(c) of the Code. Thus, taxpayer’s status as a probationary member of the Conference did not prevent him from being a minister for purposes of section 1402(c).

In Haimowitz v. Commissioner, T.C.M. 1997-40, the Tax Court concluded that the taxpayer, a synagogue administrator, was not a minister of the gospel for purposes of section 107 of the Code. He had been employed by a temple for 30 years and was recognized as a Fellow in Synagogue Administration. He performed various services for the temple, including assisting students with Bar and Bat Mitzvah preparation, serving as marriage ceremony director, and conducting services for mourners. On his income tax return he specified that he was a religious functionary and asserted that as a religious functionary he was a minister of the gospel within the meaning of section 107. Here the Tax Court concluded that taxpayer did not meet the requirements of regulation section 1.1402(c)-5(b)(2). Specifically, the court found that the duties he performed, although related to the Jewish religion, were organizational in nature and did not require performance from one with ministerial credentials. The court then noted the religious rites and ceremonies he did not perform. He never fulfilled the role of rabbi or cantor, and the services he did perform were secular in nature. For example, he never officiated at a wedding or a funeral, and he merely assisted the rabbi at religious services. Thus, the court concluded he did not perform regularly those duties that the minister of the Jewish faith customarily performs. In addition, the court found taxpayer’s recognition as a Fellow in Synagogue Administration was irrelevant, as that designation is not a recognized religious official of the Jewish religion. The court also noted that taxpayer did not present any evidence that the temple considered him to be a religious leader. Accordingly, the court concluded that taxpayer failed to demonstrate that he was a minister of the gospel.

Discussion

Applying the test established in Wingo, we conclude that C, D, and E are ministers of the gospel performing services in the exercise of their ministries within the meaning of section 1.1402(c)-5(b)(2) of the regulations. As ordained members of the clergy in the Church, C, D, and E conduct worship and assist with the sacraments. In addition, as ordained members of the clergy in full connection they perform services in the control, conduct, and maintenance of the Church. Further, X and the Church consider C, D, and E to be religious leaders who can perform substantially all of the religious functions within the scope of the Church’s tenets and practices. We find that E is distinguishable for the synagogue administrator in Haimowitz, as E is an ordained member of the Clergy in full connection. E officiates at weddings and funerals and will regularly perform the duties that members of the clergy of the Church customarily perform. Accordingly, C, D, and E are performing services as “ministers of the gospel” within the meaning of section 107 of the Code. Thus, C, D, and E are eligible to have a portion of their salary designated as a parsonage allowance. Any parsonage allowance will be excluded from gross income, provided the allowance is designated and paid in accordance with section 107. We further conclude that the services C, D, and E perform are in the exercise of their ministry within the meaning of section 3121(b)(8) of the Code.

This ruling is not intended to imply or suggest that the mere designation of an individual as a minister is sufficient to conclude that the individual is a minister of the gospel for purposes of sections 107, 1402, 3121, or 3401 of the Code. Nor does this ruling suggest that the Service has departed from its position in Rev. Rul. 59-270. This ruling applies only to C, D, and E with respect to the services they perform for X. No opinion is expressed as to the federal tax consequences of the transaction described above under any other provision of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(j)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

JERRY E. HOLMES
Chief, Branch 2
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Employee Benefits and Exempt Organizations)

 
 
 

PDF iconFiles marked with this icon can be downloaded in printable Adobe Acrobat format. This file requires the free Acrobat Reader. For best results, right-click the link (or click and hold for Macintosh), select "save target as" and save the document to your desktop for viewing and printing.

Click here to download the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 
PC(USA) Home (Link)
     
   
  Home  
   
  Basic Organization  
   
  Property  
   
  Incorporation and Boards of Trustees  
   
  Copyright and Trademark  
   
  Contracts  
   
  Personnel  
   
  Immigration  
   
   
   
  Risk Management and Insurance  
   
  Estates and Planned Giving  
   
  Other Resources  
 
     
  For more information on the Legal Resource Manual contact Brenda Smithers - 100 Witherspoon Street - Louisville, KY - 40202-1396 - (888) 728-7228, x5377 or click here to email  
     
  Link to Top of Page  
 
Contact PC(USA)