| |
|
|
| |
Native American Churchwide Policy Statement |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Background
Statement
Churchwide Policy Statement |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Background Statement
The exploring companies of England sought charters
from the Crown. In almost all of their charters they stoutly
avowed that evangelization of the Indians was a major and chief
purpose of British exploration and colonization. Similar charters
were drawn up by other countries. Most were designed to secure
the wealth and land from the New World. The original great seal
of Massachusetts shows and Indian shouting the Macedonian call,
"Come over and help us!" The last mention of evangelization
in a charter occurred in the case of Pennsylvania.
Indian work by the Protestants began with Thomas Mayhew, Jr.,
in 1643. American Protestant home missions to the Indians were
a precursor to the global evangelistic enterprise. Most of the
inspiration, theory and models were first developed in an attempt
to evangelize Indians, then exported as mission policy and program
overseas.
Evangelization and civilization were considered inseparable the
Europeans. The church and federal policy were so intertwined
that it is extremely difficult to separate them, and not to
recognize this with respect to Indian history is to create a
large gap of misunderstanding in the history of federal-Indian
relationships.
The federal governments responsibility for Indian affairs after
the inauguration of the Constitution rested in the War Department.
General Henry Knox, first Secretary of War, decided that civilization
was the only alternative to extinction of the red man. He believed
that Christian missionaries, or persons so motivated, were best
able to undertake such a program as he recommended to President
Washington in 1789.
Earlier, in 1706 near Philadelphia, the first presbytery has been
organized by Francis Makemie. There were only seven non-Indian
ministers and "certain elders" present. The first official
non-Indian missionary among Indian people was probably Azariah
Horton, who commenced his work on Long Island. The work at Shinnecock
on Long Island began in 1741. This work still continues within
the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). In 1722, Gideon Blackburn (a Presbyterian)
was given a commission to work among the Cherokees. This is what
his commission said:
The standing committee on missions, acting under the authority
and order of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church
of the United States of America, confiding very much in your
piety, prudence, indulgence and zeal, have appointed, and by
these present do appoint you, the Reverend Gideon Blackburn,
their mission to the Cherokee Nation of Indians for the purpose
of carrying them gospel and the arts of civilized life to them:
in which service you are to spend two months at the season you
may find most convenient and to be governed by such instructions
as shall be given you by this committee from time to time.
Blackburn, in the spirit of John Calvin, started a school for
Indian people in Tennessee. The federal government paid the
salaries of the teachers and missionaries. The House of Representatives,
responding to President Madison's annual message to Congress
in 1818, recommended that the Indians be "moralized" rather
than exterminated and established a permanent "civilization
fund" by an act of March, 1819. It provided a major appropriation
of $10,000, but it worked wonders in calling the churches
to action. The subsidy was available for schools of agriculture
and mechanical and domestic crafts for tribes near the borders
of settlements. The fact that the federal government provided
funds for mission endeavors is apparent. On several occasions
the General Assembly expressed appreciation to the government
of the United States for its attempt to civilize the Indian
people. In the General Assembly's report of 1820, it is reported
"Resolved that the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church
in the
United States are highly gratified in observing the civilization
of the
Indian tribes within its territories by supportive schools and
by introducing among them the arts of social life. The Assembly
feel confident that the general government, adopting these measures,
act in accordance with the wishes of a large proportion of the
American people. The Assembly sincerely pray that the Supreme
Being may bless these exertions to reclaim the aborigines of
our continent from the darkness and ferocity of their savage
state, the privileges and enjoyments of Christian civilization."
(Minutes, 1789-1820, p.734).
The second large increase in mission activity with Indian people
during the nineteenth century was caused by President U. S. Grants
"peace policy." The Bureau of Indian Affairs had become
corrupt at every level of administration. Agents and suppliers
made fortunes out of jobs and contracts. Concerned persons called
for a reformation and suggested enlisting the help of the churches.
The Quakers were the first group of church people asked to become
Indian agents. After that other denominations followed. It is
unfortunate, however, that many of the agents recommended by
the churches similarly fell prey to their own avarice. Persons,
through graft and favors shown to real estate people and mineral
development people, were able to retire after five years of employment.
In 1887 the churches supported the Dawes Act, which ostensibly
would have made Indian people citizens within 25 years if they
displayed any responsibility. The plan was to make Indian people
farmers and to allot them acreage they could own and develop.
Any unused or unclaimed land therefore went into the landholding
of the United States. As a consequence of the Dawes Act, the Indian
people actually lost 90 million acres of land. The great experiment
of making Indians farmers, and therefore civilized, did not work.
For these many reasons Indian people view the church and the federal
government as the two primary institutions on reservations that
have regulated the lives of Indian people.
In more recent times, the population movement and the concurrent
demand for the land have demonstrated that the movement to wrest
lands from Indian ownership will continue. This occurs whenever
federal bureaucracies permit diverting of river beds, building
dams to flood Indian land, and reducing water rights, which sometimes
result in the outright negating of treaties, all in the name of
"progress." States may attempt to take over jurisdiction
of Indian lands, introduce taxation, and thus cause land loss.
This will occur in spite of the fact that many tribes have had
solemn treaties with the federal government and not with the state
governments. Smaller tribes do not have adequate funds to test
the legality of any of these actions in the courts.
In 1964, the churches established a 22 person committee representing
eleven denominations, including the Roman Catholic Church, to
begin the Indian Goals Study. (See Minutes, 1963, Part I, pp.237
ff.) This study was not completes until 1968.The study came
out with a strong stand for self-determination for Indian people.
It was recommended that each denomination establish an Indian
board that would aid mission development. It also recommended
that Indian executives be employed as staff persons within mission
boards. Despite the long history of the church's involvement
with Indian people, employment of Indian staff did not occur
until 1970.
During this same time, the 181st General Assembly (1969) of the
United Presbyterian Church provided $100,000 seed money to be
used for creative projects on Indian reservations. An ad hoc committee
was set up to validate the proposals generated by this fund. This
committee was known as the Indian Consulting Panel. The next year,
the 182nd General Assembly (1970) provided a similar amount of
$100,000 to expand program development, primarily for youth ministries
since the Indian population was very young. Fifty percent were
under 17, 65 percent were under 21, and 75 percent were under
25 years of age. This action extended the life and activity of
the Indian Consulting Panel.
During these years the Board of National Missions had five of
their board members relate to and serve with the Indian Consulting
Panel in developing policy and program. It must be understood
that this was an ad hoc committee only for the purpose of validating
proposals. However, during this time Indian members began to become
more familiar and acquainted with the policies, personnel and
structure of the United Presbyterian Church. Consequently, recommendations
were made for changes in structure and in policy and new funds
were sought to support these programmatic ideas.
Lastly, in the fall of 1971, restructure was moving toward its
eventual conclusion and the Indian Consulting Panel developed
a position paper entitled, "We May Be Brothers After All"
in which it stated the historical, theological, and programmatic
position of the Indian people as developed through the Indian
Goals Study and the activity of the Indian Consulting Panel. This
was endorsed and approved by the 184th General Assembly (1972)
meeting in Denver, Colorado. This approval called for the continuance
of such a committee in the new structure and recommended new nomenclature,
i.e., "Native American" for "Indian," in order
to be more inclusive of Eskimo and Aleut work.
In 1974 a preliminary agreement was reached with the Program Agency
within the new structure, establishing the Native American Consulting
Committee, which was given final approval in 1977. The agreement
provided for recommendations and evaluation powers for programs
and projects seeking national funding as well as the committee
providing counsel to decision-making bodies of General Assembly
agencies and synods. The Native American Consulting Committee
could also propose recommendations on model programs, research
capability, and use of program funds. An administrative budget
is provided to the Native American Consulting Committee by the
Program Agency.
In 1976 the Consulting Committee felt that it was time to have
a consultation of Native American people on a national level
because it would be the first time such a meeting was held since
the restructure. The questions of roles and functions, lines
of accountability, funding and relationships had not been clearly
defined. The consultation called together representative of
the Program Agency, the Native American Consulting Committee,
and the seven synods that have Native American congregational
work, namely the Synod of Alaska-Northwest, Synod of the Pacific,
Synod of the Southwest, Synod of the Sun, Synod of the Rockies,
Synod of Lakes and Prairies and the Synod of the Northeast.
At the conclusion of the consultation, recommendations were
made to the Program Agency, to the seven synods represented
and to the Native American Consulting Committee.
In 1978 this was followed up by another consultation, which included
representation from all the previous bodies plus representatives
of all national agencies, the purpose of which was to report on
activity since the previous consultation and to prepare the following
church wide policy statement that would go to the General Assembly
in 1979.
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
 |
| |
Churchwide
Policy Statement
Preamble:
In common commitment to the work of Jesus Christ and of his Church:
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), conscious of the continuing
call of Christ to minister to the needs of the world, declares
its commitment to the support of the principle of self-determination
for Native American congregations and of the partnership between
them and the governing board to which they are related. The
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) further declares its commitment
to the continuance and strengthening of ministry with Native
American through institutional or governing board projects and
programs within the church that Native Americans themselves have
had the opportunity to plan and implement. (The term, "Native
American," throughout
the policy statement incorporates all indigenous tribal groups
in the United States of America and includes American Indians,
Aleuts, and Eskimos.)
1. Mutuality in Mission
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will seek to understand Native
American culture and respect the philosophy, values and heritage
of Native Americans in order that Presbyterians may learn from
Native American lifestyles and benefit from fellowship with
them.
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will continue, and expand as
needed and possible, the fundamental aspects of its work such
as Christian nurture, education, mission service and outreach
among Native Americans, in accordance with Native American concepts.
Where it is advisable to develop ministry among Native Americans,
national agencies, synods, presbyteries and sessions will undertake
such tasks in consultation with Native Americans. These ministries
will include advocacy for issues of concern within the broader
Native American community such as treaty rights, human and civil
rights and the protection of land, water and other natural
resources.
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) through its agencies and governing
boards will make it possible for Native Americans to participate
and contribute fully in the total life of the church in order
that the whole church may be enriched and benefit from partnership
and involvement in the larger body of Christ. The Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.) will develop ways to include Native Americans
in its decision-making process, especially in those areas that
affect the lives and destinies of Native Americans.
2. Preparation for Native American Ministry
Native American ministerial candidates and non-Native American
pastors engaged in ministries with Native Americans must be
oriented to Native American culture, heritage, history and
religious thought. Further training, designed to fit each ministry
and taking into consideration such concerns as community values
and local patterns of leadership, must be included in the candidates
or pastors preparation for that ministry. In the light of increased
costs of providing such theological education, priority consideration
must be given to curriculum development and significant scholarship
aid.
In addition to existing patterns of theological education, alternative
programs such as theological education by extension should be
supported, enabling candidates to remain within their culture
and community while undergoing preparation for the ministry.
3. Leadership
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) is committed to a ministry that
is trained, ordained, and installed according to certain prescribed
standards. In the area of Native American work, these standards
may require modification because our experience has taught us
that formal education as a minister cannot be the only, or even
the primary, consideration in many cases. The Presbyterian Church
(U.S.A.) must recognize that qualities such as cultural understanding
(that is, the insight to recognize the native "view"
and the ability to use insight effectively), facility in the
use of a native language and acceptance by ones racial peers
may well be an essential qualification for ultimate success.
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will work toward the provision of
a competent ministry in every Native American congregation. The
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) must accept the challenge of recruiting
Native Americans and giving them as much training as may be necessary,
based upon their previous education attainments.
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) commits itself to exploring and
defining specific ordination and educational standards for Native
Americans that are acceptable within Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
polity and compatible with needs of Native American congregations.
4. Continuing Education
Continuing education opportunities are important to Native Americans
in the professional ministry. The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will
seek ways to provide for such continuing education, including
financial support where necessary. Sabbatical and study leave
provisions should be included within the pastor's call. In addition,
cooperative efforts by national agencies, governing bodies, and
church educational institutions should be undertaken to develop
special programs designed to address specific and current concerns
in Native American communities.
5. Pastoral Support
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) commits itself to the principle
of adequate financial compensation and benefits for pastors and
their families serving the Native American congregations. These
benefits will be insured through presbytery and session negotiation at
the extending of, and throughout the duration of, the pastoral
call. Provision will be made by the appropriate governing bodies
for the spiritual care and moral support of the pastor and family
serving Native American communities.
6. Lay Leadership
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) through its presbyteries will provide
resources to train elders ad other lay leaders for witness and
service in both church and community.
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will provide for the leadership
development of Native American young people, including the assistance
toward helping them choose a career in the ordained ministry
or other church-related fields, such as Christian education,
social and human resources, church administration. In addition,
the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will provide counseling and
support for Native American students pursuing training in various
secular fields.
7. Facilities, Buildings, and Land
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will encourage the use if criteria
set for constructing and maintaining church buildings, facilities,
land and equipment utilized in Native American ministries that
conform to the highest possible standards for promotion of their
mission. The church should encourage construction of buildings
that are commensurate with the type of architecture and style
of building within a particular Native American community. Each
session should be encouraged to develop adequate facilities
for completion of such programs. Guidelines for the use of denominational
resources available for financing buildings shall be flexible
enough to meet the needs of each congregation. Whenever consideration
is given by any governing body or agency to the disposition
of church property that is related to Native American ministry,
the appropriate Native American consulting body will be given
adequate prior notification requesting its comments or recommendations
or both. Such consultation will occur even when the church-owned
building or land may not presently be used for Native American
work.
8. National Agency, Council, and Committee Relations
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will promote and effect through
the General Assembly Committee on Nominations the membership
of Native Americans on agencies, councils and committees at
the national level. The agencies, councils and committees
will seek advice and consultation with Native Americans through
appropriate channels on all matters pertaining to Native American
ministry.
9. Ecumenical Relationships
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will support and promote ecumenical
participation and development of endeavors among Native Americans
particularly on the reservation and in urban areas where denominational
differences impede Christian witness. National ecumenical relationships
will include the Indian Ministries Task Force of the Joint strategy
and Action Committee (JSAC), the Joint Native American Staff
(JNAS) and the National Council of Churches Commission on Justice,
Liberation and Human Fulfillment. The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
recognizes also the necessity for creating relationships with
other Christian bodies related to Native American ministry,
traditional Native American religious groups and international
indigenous peoples organizations as the need arises.
10. Secular Relationships
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will affirm, assist, and be an advocate
for the efforts of Native American people as they negotiate with
voluntary agencies, as well as governmental and intergovernmental
agencies, for the betterment of Native American life, both on
and off the reservation.
11. Urban Ministries
As more and more American Indian people move from reservations
and many to cities, urban ministry with American Indians becomes
critically important to the Church. The diverse tribal backgrounds
represented in an urban area present unique challenges for ministry.
This ministry is not limited only to the spiritual well being
of American Indian persons but also must address social needs
and justice issues.
12. Youth Ministries
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will assist and support the Native
American Youth Ministries in developing programs which will increase
the knowledge of the functioning of the church through Youth conferences
and other events that will encourage the Native American Youth
to Indian ministry. This support should include finances and leadership
when requested.
13. Economics
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will advocate and promote Native
American economic development on reservations and in urban areas.
Reproduced by: Office of Native American
Congregational Enhancement PC(USA)
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|