GIVE NOW to support Presbyterian Disaster Assistance’s response to the unaccompanied children and border crisis in the United States. Give now

GAPJC upholds Spahr rebuke for performing same-gender weddings

Pastor conducted 16 ceremonies while they were legal in California

February 22, 2012

Louisville

The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)’s highest court has upheld the censure of the Rev. Jane Spahr for performing 16 same-gender marriages in California during a time that such rites were legal in the state.

The General Assembly Permanent Judicial Commission’s (GAPJC) vote was 9-6, indicating the denomination’s continuing struggle to decide the limits of “pastoral care” as more states legalize same-sex marriage.

The PC(USA)’s Book of Order defines marriage as “between a man and a woman,” but several overtures to the upcoming 220th General Assembly call for that definition to be changed.

“I feel sad for the church because I think it's such a right and loving thing to be with couples on this journey of marriage and deep intimacy with one another,” Spahr told Reuters after the decision was announced.

Spahr, 69, is a retired PC(USA) pastor and grandmother. She was originally censured in Redwoods Presbytery for officiating at 16 same-gender weddings between May 2008, when the California Supreme Court struck down a ban on same-sex matrimony, and November of that year, when voters approved a state constitutional amendment reinstating it.

The Redwoods decision was upheld by the Synod of the Pacific’s PJC.

Censure carries no further form of discipline in the PC(USA).

“The issue is not simply the same-sex ceremony,” the GAPJC majority wrote in its decision. “It is the misrepresentation that the Presbyterian Church ... recognizes the ceremony and the resulting relationship to be a marriage in the eyes of the church.”

The ruling cites a 1991 “authoritative interpretation” of the PC(USA) constitution, in which the GAPCC said that Presbyterian ministers should not perform same-sex union ceremonies “that the minister determines to be the same as a marriage ceremony.”

The six dissenters said the censure of Spahr perpetuates the notion that gay couples “are children of a lesser God.” They wrote: “As Christians, we claim the high goal of loving and including all, then seek to exclude the (gay) community. This second-class ... treatment proclaims the hypocrisy of our present interpretations.”

Ordained in 1974, two years before coming to the self-realization she was a lesbian, Spahr was the first openly gay minister called to pastor a PC(USA) congregation. The GAPJC blocked her call to Downtown Presbyterian Church in Rochester, N.Y. The church responded by hiring to create and lead “That All May Freely Serve,” a nationwide ministry that advocates full inclusion of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered Presbyterians in the church, including service as church officers.

Last summer, the 173 PC(USA) presbyteries ratified an amendment to the church’s constitution that allows ― but doesn’t require ― the ordination of gay and lesbian Presbyterians in committed same-sex relationships.

  1. I have always supported gay rights and believe that states should allow civil unions of gay couples. However, no minister of the Presbyterian faith should violate the sanctity of the religious marriage ceremony by uniting gay couples. Censure is not enough. The retired minister should have been removed, formally, from the Presbyterian ministry and the gay marriages annulled. Her acts violate the sanctity of the sacrament of marriage.

    by Irene Hahn

    March 18, 2012

  2. When my husband and I chose to be married under the laws of California the officiant was a former presbyterian whose calling to ministry is supported by the UCC and the Disciples of Christ. Other than making the PCUSA irrelevant to the lives of lesbian and gay persons, it is hard to see any consequence of this ruling. At its heart, the Judicial Commission's ruling is simply evidence that idolatry is alive and well in the PCUSA, specifically idolatry of man/woman marriage.

    by Harlan Penn

    February 25, 2012

  3. Thank you GAPJC for a correct and fair ruling. May God continue to help us face ongoing challenges in our struggle to understand what it means to be Christian.

    by anne Banks

    February 25, 2012

  4. It is difficult to imagine any person, any where who understood Rev. Sparh's actions as "[representing] that the Presbyterian Church ... recognizes the ceremony and the resulting relationship to be a marriage in the eyes of the church." When my husband and I were married under the law of California, it was solemnized by a friend who once sought to become a PCUSA minister but instead found his calling accepted in the UCC and Disciples of Christ. I made that choice so as not to force a PCUSA minister to make a choice to officiate. Sad burdens we place on one another.

    by Harlan Penn

    February 24, 2012

  5. This is a sad day for all Presbyterians. This GAPJC decision is not consistent with Christ's teachings or ministry.

    by James B. Swan

    February 24, 2012

  6. This is refreshing news. A big thumbs up to the leaders of the church. May the Holy Spirit continue to convict others who feel same-sex is good

    by Gyekye-Mensah S

    February 24, 2012

  7. Great, I am gald to hear the ruling of the GAPJC and support the interpletation of the GAPJC majority. I appreciate their courage and clear understanding.

    by Jung Nam Lee

    February 23, 2012

Leave a comment