| An
online publication of the Office of the General Assembly |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Doubt, Imagination, and Truth: The Domain of the Church-Related Liberal Arts College by
John V. Griffith, President, Presbyterian College Genesis 1: 26-28a,
31a
The discernment of truth is the business of higher learning. Einstein’s miracle year in which he discerned five major truths about how the universe works helps us understand the human tools the academy nurtures in the search for truth. To amplify these tools, I need to tell a story about two men: Galileo Galilei and Albert Einstein. In 1632, Galileo imagined a problem in relation to his doubts about Aristotle’s statements on bodies in motion: Galileo imagined two people observing a sail boat, one from atop the mast and one from the dock. The sail boat is moving rapidly along and the person atop the mast drops a large stone. Where does the stone land? To the man atop the mast, he observes that the stone lands at the base of the mast – straight down. But, to the man on the dock, the stone appears to fall at an angle and must have landed behind the mast. There it is! Our perception of bodies in motion is relative to our position. At the age of 16, in 1895, Albert Einstein imagined a new problem resulting from his doubts about the universality of Galileo’s statements on bodies in motion: what if the man atop a very, very tall mast – a mast 186,282 miles tall, the distance light travels in a second – dropped a beam of light down the mast? What would the two men observe? They observe the same thing as with a stone. But how could this be since the speed of light is constant. In May of 1905, ten years later, on a walk with a friend, Einstein discovered the answers to his doubt. From the point of view of the person on the dock, the time it took the light to reach the ship’s deck was longer than a second. In order for this to happen time itself differs for the two observers. There it is! Time is relative! The world as we knew it was set on its head. It was doubt—doubting what was currently taken to be the truth; it was imagination—imagining a new way of examining the status quo that led to new truth. Doubt – imagination – truth, the domain of higher learning. We know how to do this very well. We have pulled back the curtain of ignorance and continually expanded the horizon of what we know to be true. We introduce students to the great questions of doubt, engage them in the best of what the human imagination has conjured up to discern how all this works. In answering how, reason reigns supreme in the academy. Houston Smith, one the great commentators on human spirituality, was fond of saying, “The larger the island of knowledge, the greater the shoreline of wonder.” What about wonder? What about the why? Why is all this here? What is the meaning of it all? The church-related institution of higher learning is also concerned with why: the beauty of the birth of a child and the horror of the Nazi concentration camp…the awesome majesty of Mt. Everest and the devastation caused by hurricane Katrina. Reason helps us come to grips with how such things happen. Faith helps us come to grips with why. It was Frederick Beuchner who said, “Doubts are the ants in the pants of faith.” The church-related college works to clarify the doubts of young believers, expose them to the best and fullest expression of these doubts, and engages their imaginations in discerning truth. We seek to discern the path from doubt to faith…how to get from what we know to what we cannot know…how to get from out every day experience to God when we reason we cannot place our hands on the wounds of the risen Christ. The first quality church-related college, washed in the Reformed Tradition, comes at the quest for truth through the full powers of reason and faith fueled by doubt and imagination. This is what we do best. For the great quests of humankind that require both our capacities for reason and faith our graduates are uniquely suited. Take for example three current issues: Many scientists, some of them people of faith, claim that Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases can likely be cured by embryonic stem cells. Other people of faith say that to do so will violate the sanctity of human life by destroying human embryos. Many government leaders, some of them people of faith, say that terrorism is fueled by cultural, economic, religious and political priorities of Islamic nations and will be solved through political means. Other people of faith claim that terror will cease only when Muslims are converted to a democratic and Christian way of life. Many educators and scientists, some of them people of faith, say that the teaching of evolution in the public schools is essential to a solid foundation in the biological sciences. Other people of faith claim that this is problematic because it is a theory and not fact and leaves no room for God in the creation of human beings. It occurs to me that all issues of substance are really matters of both reason and faith. And so, our commitment to examining the great issues of our time through the powers of reason must be second to none. Similarly, our commitment to understanding the meaning and perspective that faith brings to these same matters must be a defining characteristic of our missions. Our commitment to exploring the relationship between the two is our highest calling. This is the great undertaking that has defined Presbyterian higher education in America for nearly 300 years. To each graduating class at Presbyterian College I pose a series of rhetorical questions. One of them is this:
God, for creating
us in your image, we give you thanks. Amen! |
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Items
marked with |
|||||||||||||||||