Theology and Worship PC(USA) Seal
 
 
             
  End of Life Issues  
     
 

The 213th General Assembly (2001) directed the Office of Theology and Worship to conduct a six-year churchwide dialogue on end-of-life issues.

General Assembly Action

As part of this initiative, the Office of Theology and Worship commissioned a Presbyterian Panel study on end-of-life issues.

 
     
 
 

General Assembly Action On a Churchwide Dialogue on End-of-Life Issues.

That the 213th General Assembly (2001):

1. Request the Office of Theology to do the following:

a. Organize and host a national dialogue to be held in 2002–2003 on theological issues related to end-of-life care, including the articulation of a biblical ethic within the bounds of historic Christian faith that encompasses both pastoral care and palliative care. The Office of Theology shall invite presenters holding differing perspectives consistent with the Reformed faith as expressed in the confessions of our church; send invitations to the event to all congregations; and compile and make available resources to the whole church that result from this meeting.

b. Urge presbyteries and local congregations to follow up the national conference with similar presbytery-wide dialogues over the following two years (2004–2005) in order to emphasize the importance of discussion between and among congregations, and to add to resources generated by the national conference.

c. Prepare a compilation of resources consistent with the Reformed faith as expressed in the confessions of our church, which includes resources generated from both the national and presbytery dialogues to be submitted to the 218th General Assembly (2006). The resources shall express a biblical ethic on the end of life, and pastoral and palliative care based on the biblical ethic. The resources shall be made available as an aid to pastoral teaching and care.

d. Encourage churches and presbyteries to communicate with the General Assembly and its offices, expressing findings and convictions resulting from their studies and discussions that would serve as a basis for any policy development at the General Assembly level.

2. Defer any effort at policy development on the end of life until 2006 and request the 218th General Assembly (2006) to review the resources generated and the communications sent from lower governing bodies to determine whether the General Assembly finds a need for policy on this subject, and whether a consensus has developed that would guide the development of policy on the end of life.

Rationale

Advancing medical technologies, combined with the aging of the largest segment of the American population, have brought consideration of end-of-life issues to the fore. Recent research, such as that done by the Duke Institute on Care at the end of life, shows that there is both concern and confusion about end-of-life issues in the culture and the church. While the church is needed to speak a timely word on this subject, there is a notable lack of both pastoral teaching and resources for pastoral care ministry in this regard. Churches, and in particular church leaders, need to consider together end-of-life issues in light of biblical and Reformed theology. This discussion can best occur in dialogue with our members who have faced end-of-life care issues in the context of faith. Grassroots experience must meet biblical reflection in order for the church to speak a clear and grace-filled word to the culture.

Sound theology is the foundation of biblically sound policy and practice. The articulation of a biblical ethic within the bounds of historic Christian faith is the beginning from which any policy and practice in our church should flow. A clear understanding is needed, for we will meet resistance in the culture. There is strong political advocacy in certain parts of our country for the removal of any legal restrictions on euthanasia and assisted suicide. Nevertheless, we are encouraged that the three most prominent professional associations—the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Nurses Association—all have condemned physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Much of the current debate around physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia is based on unexamined assumptions as to what constitutes sound medical practice and effective pain management, and does not include the significant advances in the field of palliative care. There is a need, then, for interaction between the church and the medical community in meeting the needs of families facing concerns at the end of life.

It has been six years since the release of a study guide on end-of-life issues by the Office of Theology, but only fewer than twenty responses from churches have been received. We have failed to achieve the grassroots consideration that is needed. Such dialogue should supercede any top-down policy development in order that a fruitful interaction may occur between (a) the needs and the witness of our people, (b) the expertise of the medical community, and (c) our theological and biblical heritage. The church needs to reach a point of knowing and expressing its own mind prior to the formal process of developing a General Assembly policy that expresses a word from the church to the world.

 
             
PC(USA) Home (Link)
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
   
     
  Call to Worship  
     
  LINK: Office of Spiritual Formation  
     
  LINK: Office of Theological Education  
     
     
  For more information: Nicole Gerkins - (888) 728-7228 extension 5029 - send email - or write to 100 Witherspoon Street, Louisville, KY 40202  
     
  Link to Top of Page  
 
Contact PC(USA) (link)
Copyright Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). All Rights Reserved.