| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
What Presbyterians Believe |
|
April 2003 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
An ongoing series of
articles on the distinctive beliefs and practices of Presbyterians.
View other What
Presbyterians Believe articles. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
How Presbyterians make decisions
We listen to each other—and
to the Bible and the church's constitution.
By Jack Rogers |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Every year the Presbyterian
Church struggles with enormous moral questions.
In February 2002, as moderator of the General Assembly, I visited
the Great Lakes Naval Training Center near Chicago. I met with
the base commander—a two-star admiral, a woman and a Presbyterian.
Her name is Ann Rondeau. After the usual pleasantries she asked
me a penetrating question: "Are the churches discussing
what constitutes a just war?" As Presbyterians wrestle
with this profound question, it is helpful to ask how we as
a body make such important decisions. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Presbyterians are not do-it-yourselfers.
We make decisions as a community. This is a way of living out
the Biblical notion that God has created a covenant community.
We base our decisions on our traditional sources of authority
and guidance—the Bible and the church's constitution.
We pray and seek the guidance of the Holy Spirit in interpreting
these sources of authority. We listen to each other, believing
that God speaks in the community of the church.
Our representative form of government puts significant responsibility
on all members of the church. It is not easy to be a Presbyterian.
We are continually called upon to decide whom we should elect
and what side of multiple issues we should support. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For example, some denominations believe that
Christians should always support the civil government, especially
in matters such as war. Other denominations have an inherent suspicion
of civil government and tend to withdraw their support from it.
For Presbyterians it is always a judgment call. Like John Knox
and five friends who produced the Scots Confession in 1560 (one
of the 11 confessions in the Book of Confessions), we should
obey the orders of "rulers, and superior powers ... if they
are not contrary to the commands of God." |
|
| For
more information:
- Chapman, WIlliam E., History and
Theology in the Book of Order: Blood on Every Page.
Louisville: Witherspoon Press, 1999.
- Rogers, Jack, Reading the Bible
and the Confessions: The Presbyterian Way. Louisville:
Geneva Press, 1999.
- Smylie, James H., A Brief History
of the Presbyterians. Louisville: Geneva Press,
1996.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
That big if is why we study things so much.
We always need to discern what the will of God is and how it
should be applied in complex situations.
Human limitations
Our Presbyterian predecessors in earlier
centuries were keenly aware of our human limitations. For example,
in the Westminster Confession of Faith, finished in 1647,
we are reminded that "all things in Scripture are not alike
plain in themselves, nor alike clear unto all." Those things
"necessary to be known, believed, and observed for salvation"
are clear. However, "in all controversies of religion"
the church needs to use scholarly study to help us sort out
our differences. That requires us all to be patient with each
other and do our homework until we reach some consensus.
The authors of the Westminster Confession
of Faith did not exempt themselves from examination. They
honestly asserted that "all synods or councils since the
apostles' times, whether general or particular, may err, and
many have erred; therefore they are not to be made the rule
of faith or practice, but to be used as a help in both."
We must prayerfully seek the guidance of the Holy Spirit and
listen to one another in the church in order wisely to use the
insights of our sources of authority and guidance. Neither Scripture
nor confessions are rightly used when we pull sentences out
of their context and make them into universal laws. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |

Illustration by Shane Kelley.
1640—First Presbyterian
churches are organized
1706—Seven congregations
come together in Philadelphia to form the first presbytery
1716—Four presbyteries
gather together to form the first synod
1788—The first Book
of Order is published--much shorter than today's version
1789—The first General
Assembly meets in Philadelphia.
|
|
The American Presbyterian
system developed from the
bottom up, with congregations forming presbyteries, then
synods and finally the General Assembly. This is in constrast
to the Scots Presbyterian experience. In Scotland the
Scottish Parliament imposed Presbyterian government on
the state church, starting with a General Assembly and
creating under it synods and presbyteries.

Who copied whom?
Sometimes Presbyterians get a bit
over-enthusiastic and claim that the United States government
is modeled on Presbyterian polity. It is more accurate
to say that people in that time period were wrestling
with the same issues and ideas and came to very similar
conclusions about the best way to govern. To the right
are moments in early U.S. Presbyterianism. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Presbyterian way of making
decisions looks a lot like the way the New Testament church
made decisions as recorded in Acts 15:1-21. When there is a
disagreement, we turn it over to a chosen group of representatives.
In Acts those representatives were the apostles and the elders.
They listened to expert testimony from those who knew the issue
best—Peter and Paul and Barnabas. There was a lot of dissension
and debate. People understood the Old Testament Scriptures differently.
In the end the apostles and elders discerned
that a new thing was happening, the conversion of the Gentiles.
They discovered that it was in accord with God's plan as revealed
in Scripture. Then they made some practical compromises so that
the values of differing groups were honored. Their decision
opened the door of the church to us.
Making decisions as Presbyterians is often
a slow process that takes a great deal of work. Making decisions
this way, however, usually yields wise judgments rooted in God's
revelation and our best human reflection. If we listen attentively
to the Spirit of God, as we hear the greatest diversity of voices
and earnestly seek to be faithful to the Bible and our constitution,
we are as likely as humans can be to make good decisions.
Diversity is good
Presbyterians believe that the best decisions
are made when the broadest possible representation of our diversity
participates. We believe in the equality of all people before
God, and therefore our system represents a parity, an equality,
of persons. There are always both elders and ministers qualified
to vote in every governing body. We seek to have women as well
as men represented. We encourage people of every race and ethnicity
to participate.
Slow progress
At times in our history we have been
captive to a general cultural prejudice that prevented us from
welcoming diversity. For example, from the founding of the Presbyterian
Church in this country down into the 1950s we tolerated first
slavery and then racial segregation in church and society. Until
the mid-20th century the only persons voting in our governing
bodies were white men. Several landmarks on the road to diversity:
1930—Women are admitted to
the office of elder
1956—First woman is ordained as a minister of
Word and Sacrament
1964—First African American is elected moderator
of the General Assembly
2002—The PCUSA becomes a member of Churches Uniting
in Christ, a coalition of nine denominations that have committed
themselves to the recognition of each other's ministries.
In the worship service celebrating this coming together members
of the churches join in Holy Communion. The Episcopalians
choose a bishop to represent them as a celebrant. The Presbyterian
representative is an elder, a Chinese-American woman.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Decently and in order
When it is time to make a decision, Presbyterians
do not just pull ideas out of the air. Our system of government
enables an orderly process of discerning the will of God in which
everyone participates. Here is an overview. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |

Illustration by Shane Kelley. |
|
Government by the book
Presbyterians need to know and rightly
use the books we rely on for authority and guidance:
- The Bible
- The constitution of the Presbyterian Church
(U.S.A.)
The constitution consists of two books:
- The Book of Confessions
contains 11 documents, dating from the 4th century to the
late 20th century, that give us the main theological themes
our ancestors in the faith found central in Scripture.
- The Book of Order gives us guidance
for ordering our life as a community according to Scripture
and the confessions. It sets out democratic principles of
representative government and applies them to life in the
church.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
What Presbyterian government is not |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- We are not episcopal, with government from the top down.
In the Roman Catholic, Episcopal and United Methodist churches
individual bishops exercise significant authority.
|
|

Illustration by Shane Kelley. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |

Illustration by Shane Kelley. |
|
- We are not congregational, with government from the bottom
up. In congregational polity the local church's decisions
are final, with everyone getting to vote on everything. This
is characteristic of Baptists and the United Church of Christ,
among other denominations.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Representative government
Presbyterian polity is representative
government, very similar to the United States government. Authority
flows both up and down. We elect representatives to make decisions
on our behalf.
One difference in emphasis between our national
and church governments is that the persons Presbyterians elect
to represent them are expected to vote according to their consciences
as they are informed by the Holy Spirit. They cannot be instructed
by their constituency on how to vote, nor are they bound to
vote in the same way as the majority of those who elected them. |
|

Illustration by Shane Kelley. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When we don't agree |
|
| |
Presbyterians do not always agree with the
decisions of their representatives. So we have a representative
appeals process. There is a rising system of courts, called
Permanent Judicial Commissions (PJCs). Disagreements arising
in a local session can be appealed to the presbytery PJC. An
appeal can be made from the presbytery to the synod PJC and
from the synod to the Permanent Judicial Commission of the General
Assembly. There is no appeal from the General Assembly PJC.
Like the United States Supreme Court, its decisions are final.
If there is disagreement with a decision of the General Assembly
PJC, the recourse is to go back to the legislative system and
make more specific laws to guide our representatives in the
judicial system.
|
|

Illustration by Shane Kelley. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |

Illustration by Shane Kelley. |
|
Ordination—not just for clergy
The principle of gathering diverse persons
who are unified in their commitment to Jesus Christ yields a distinctive
aspect of our polity. In most denominations only clergy are ordained.
In the Presbyterian Church elders and deacons, as well as ministers,
are ordained. Deacons are ordained to a ministry of service. Elders
are ordained to a ministry of governance. Ministers of the Word
and Sacrament are ordained to service and governance and also
to a ministry of teaching and pastoral care. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
Jack Rogers, professor of
theology emeritus, San Francisco Theological Seminary, was moderator
of the 213th (2001) General Assembly of the
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |