Moving Forward on Conflict Diamond Legislation:
An Action Alert
The trade in conflict diamonds-gems that are used to fund warfare
and civilian atrocities - has caused untold suffering in Sierra
Leone as a result of a decade-long civil war. The brutal tactics
of the Revolutionary United Front (RUF), who routinely practice
mutilation of innocent civilians, notably amputation of limbs
and other body parts; forced recruitment of child soldiers,
and abduction of women to be soldiers' "wives," are
all tactics intended to maintain their reign over these lucrative
resources.
Seeking to end the trade in conflict diamonds is a key route
to ending the tragedy in Sierra Leone - and indeed elsewhere,
including Angola. The way to do this is to establish an international
diamond certification system that seeks to ensure that conflict
diamonds are kept out of the retail market. Legislation before
the US Congress moves that effort forward..
In the past week, faith-based advocates and NGOs seeking to
prevent the marketing of conflict diamonds have reached a compromise
with the diamond industry that addresses most of our earlier
concerns with current legislation. Here is what has happened.
Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL), Russ Feingold (D-WI) and Michael
DeWine (R-OH) have introduced the Clean Diamonds Act (S 1084).
The legislation will create a system to prohibit the US import
of conflict diamonds and impose serious penalties upon those
who trade in them. Given the endorsement by both the World Diamond
Council and NGOs, this bill will presumably render the industry
bill (the Conflict Diamonds Act, S 787), sponsored by Sen. Judd
Gregg (R-NH), dead.
The House counterpart (HR 918, also entitled the Clean Diamonds
Act) continues to be supported in the House by faith-based and
NGO communities, and it remains an active bill. Introduced by
Reps. Tony Hall (D-OH) and Frank Wolf (R-VA), it was countered
by a weak industry version known as the Conflict Diamond Act.
The key bones of contention were that (1) the industry wanted
to exclude jewelry, which worried advocates because it seemed
to allow the possibility that RUF rebels in Sierra Leone might
simply attach a cheap stud or ring to a diamond and thereby
avoid these restrictions; (2) there was no time line for implementation
in the industry bill; and (3) penalties were weak in their legislation.
The new Senate compromise bill includes jewelry, provides a
deadline (while allowing the President to grant extensions),
and subjects violators to strong civil and criminal penalties,
including confiscation of diamonds and the blocking of US assets.
It spells out details of the certification system, while allowing
for that system to be superceded by an international agreement
if the US is a party to such an agreement. The bill also authorizes
$5 million to aid countries that have financial difficulties
implementing the system of controls. It creates a presidential
advisory commission, with equal membership to NGOs and the diamond
industry. A labeling system, which the House version permitted,
by which jewelers could reassure their customers that their
diamonds were "conflict-free," was dropped as unnecessary.
Given these new circumstances that have emerged in the last
several days, we urge the following action: Urge the Trade Subcommittee
of the House Ways and Means Committee to "mark-up"
- bring up for consideration, amendment, and action - the Clean
Diamond Act (HR 918) as presently introduced. This will provide
Ways and Means the chance to substitute the Senate compromise
version and move the bill forward in the House.
Once that is accomplished, urge your member of Congress to
support the Clean Diamond Act. Urge your Senators to support
the Clean Diamond Act (S 1084) as introduced in the Senate.
General Assembly Notes:
The 1996 General Assembly called on the United States government
to provide strong support for human rights through its international
economic policies, especially in foreign assistance and trade.
The 211th General Assembly (1999) noted that the conditions
in Africa "receive inadequate attention in the media, as
well as inadequate attention and response by our elected officials
and members of the Presbyterian Church (USA). The wars and resulting
human rights abuses rage on a continent where the Presbyterian
Church (USA) has given the lifeblood of mission workers and
invested resources over generations." The 211th General
Assembly "focuses heightened attention, advocacy, and compassionate
response appropriate to the gravity and magnitude of the situation
in Africa. These efforts will include resources of intercessory
prayer, study and education, publicity, public policy advocacy,
pastoral care, and generous giving."
Written by Leon Spencer, Executive Director, Washington Office
on Africa, and staff of the Presbyterian Church (USA).
|