|
Friday, February 15 - The Senate is in session today, and the
election reform bill appears to be one of the only agenda items.
S 565 has been fiercely debated in the Senate over the last
three days, and much progress has been made in a short period
of time.
Though no conclusions have been reached, the bill has 50 cosponsors
and will hopefully garner the last vote necessary through favorable
amendments today. Should this bill pass the Senate, it will
have to be presented in the House of Representatives for approval.
A similar bill introduced in the House in 2001 by the Hon.
John Conyers, Jr., HR 1170, has 168 cosponsors. For the Senate
bill to pass in the House, it will require 218 favorable votes.
The House bill sponsorship is strictly partisan-only one Republican,
the Hon. Connie Morella, has crossed party lines to cosponsor
the bill. Fifty Democrats have also withheld sponsorship thus
far. Grass-roots advocates could still play a large roll in
the promotion of this bill to facilitate its passage through
the House of Representatives.
Equal Protection of Voting Rights Act of 2001
The National Association of Colored People (NAACP) has expressed
a great deal of concern regarding voting irregularities in the
November 7, 2000 election. They have been working closely with
other civil rights, civil liberties, voting rights, religious
and labor organizations to assist in the crafting of a bill
for House and Senate consideration. They would like the support
of all justice advocates for this legislation.
If passed, the bill would establish the Commission on Voting
Rights and Procedures to study and make recommendation regarding
election technology, voting and election administration. It
would develop uniform and nondiscriminatory election administration
standards, which States will be required to implement for the
2004 general Federal elections. The bill also calls for the
establishment of a grant program under which the Office of Justice
Programs and the Civil Rights Division of the Department of
Justice shall provide assistance to States and localities in
improving the administration of elections.
This Commission would hold hearings, take testimony, receive
evidence and administer oaths to those called before them. They
could require subpoenas, testimony and the production of books,
records, correspondence, memoranda, papers, documents, tapes,
and materials as they or a sub-committee or member considers
advisable to carry out their mandate. The Chair and Vice Chair
of the commission will have to act jointly in the issuing of
any subpoena.
Many in the nation stayed riveted to their televisions as news
of election problems were reported following the November 7th
elections. Some members of Congress reported that they had witnessed
for themselves some irregularities. They heard from their constituents
about problems with voting procedures in their districts. This
bill, and several others have been introduced, to address those
concerns and ascertains.
In this particular bill, the sponsors remind us that the right
to vote is a fundamental and incontrovertible right under the
Constitution and that there is a need for congress to encourage
and enable every eligible American to vote by reaffirming that
the right to vote is a fundamental right. As fewer Americans
go to the election booth, it is important that Congress encourage
and enable every eligible American to vote by reaffirming that
the United States is a democratic Government "of the people,
by the people, and for the people " where every vote does
count.
To accomplish this, the bill advances that Congress must:
- enable every eligible American to vote by eliminating procedural,
physical, and technical obstacles to voting.
- counter discrimination in voting by removing barriers to
the exercise of the constitutionally protected right to vote.
- require the elimination of physical barriers to persons
with disabilities and impairments.
- safeguard the practice of purging illegal voters from voter
rolls that it does not result in the elimination of legal
voters as well.
- ask that State governments continue to examine ways to improve
the administration of elections and to modernize mechanisms
and machinery for voting.
- use its authority under section 5 of the 14th amendment
to the Constitution of the United States and the 15th amendment
to the constitution to enact legislation to address the equal
protection violations that may be caused by outdated voting
systems.
- recognize its obligation to ensure that the necessary resources
are available to States and localities to improve election
technology and election administration and to ensure the integrity
of and full participation of all Americans in the democratic
elections process.
- assure that the design of ballots is uniform.
- reassure voters that access to ballots and polling places,
including the timely notice of voting locations and matters
relating to access is a valid expectation of the rights of
citizenship.
Proposed Commission:
Proponents of this bill as well as many citizens around the
nation, urge that the Commission have members who are knowledgeable
in election law, election technology, Federal, State or local
election administration, the Constitution or the history of
the United States. Of course it goes without saying that members
should also bring integrity, impartiality, and good judgement.
These qualifications are identified in the bill.
The 12-member Commission members will be appointed: six by
the President and three each by the Minority Leaders of the
House and Senate. If the Minority in one of the houses is of
the same party as the President then it will be the Majority
Leader of that house who selects these three. This determination
is to assure balance of political party representation. The
Chair and Vice Chair of the Commission should be selected by
the members themselves and should not be from the same party.
It is expected that the Commission will be on call once they
have had their initial meeting, which must be scheduled within
twenty days of their appointment. They will be empowered to
hold hearings when a problem arises in an election.
Hopes and Expectations - It is hoped that the Commission will
help develop standards by which federal elections can be held.
These standards would include the technical specifications for
voting machines, provisional voting procedures, and the preparation
and distribution of sample ballots. These are the situations
that raised questions and concerns during the 2000 election
where so many Americans say that they were disenfranchised and
robbed of their right to vote.
The Equal Protection of Voting Rights Act of 2001 calls for
Voting Machines that may work very much the way our Automatic
Teller Machines work at our local banks. These machines would:
permit the voter to verify the votes selected before the ballot
is cast and tabulated; before the vote is actually tabulated,
produce a paper record of the vote that was cast; be accessible
for individuals with disabilities and other individuals with
special needs; not have an error rate of more than 1%.
Many of us have wondered why it has taken so long for an important
endeavor as voting to catch up with the availability of technology.
We can access our checking account almost anywhere there is
an ATM machine. With election procedure reform, the day may
come when we can also access the voting booth from our work,
vacation or business trip. This may encourage greater political
participation by voters who have not voted in years.
It has been suggested that perhaps we should declare election-day
a federal holiday in order to assure greater participation in
the process. Although many voting places are open early in the
morning and stay open for a few hours after the ususal 9 to
5 work day, many people find it difficult to get to the polls
as they juggle the demands of family and employer. It is also
clear that as we hope to increase voter participation, we will
also have to improve the training of those who are the election
personnel and volunteers.
Provisional Voters
This proposed legislation suggests that there be a standard
set that would allow for provisional voting. Rather then simply
turning people away because their name can not be found on the
list or because there is some doubt about their citizenship
or criminal record, they would be allowed to cast a vote as
a "Provisional Voter". All Provisional Votes would
be sent promptly to a State or Local office to verify the individuals
claim that they are indeed eligible to vote. This is probably
a good idea in order to prevent people from being turned away,
however, it may be necessary to find a way to assure that previously
marginalized people are not abused even by this system that
is intended to protect them. Special attention needs to be given
to individuals who may need help in understanding the voting
process as someone who may be a first time voter or have limited
English proficiency.
|