|
The Humanitarian Crisis in Iraq
September 25, 1998
Issue:
The U.N. Security Council has suspended its anticipated October
review of the economic sanctions on Iraq, dashing hopes that
Iraqi civilians could soon begin rebuilding their economy and
their lives. The climate of confrontation, threat and diplomatic
maneuvering over Iraq's incomplete compliance with U.N. requirements
continues with no end in sight. The compassion central to religious
values compels us to stand with the suffering people of Iraq
who are caught in this deadly standoff.
Action:
Write to Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and to the permanent
deputy U.S. representative to the United Nations, Mr. A. Peter
Burleigh, making these points:
- The eight-year-old economic sanctions on Iraq have had
a devastating effect on the lives of many Iraqis and can no
longer be supported. U.S. church leaders who have delivered
humanitarian supplies to Iraq report malnutrition and disease
caused by the deteriorating infrastructure. The oil-for-food
program may alleviate the food shortage, but it is not a solution.
Compassion for the innocent civilians of Iraq who are suffering
must be our top priority.
- The United States should work within the Security Council
to end, or at least ease, the economic sanctions against Iraq.
Instead of suspending review of the sanctions, the United
States and the Security Council should seek a solution to
resolve this humanitarian crisis. The Clinton Administration
should support the efforts of U.N. Secretary General Kofi
Annan to find a compromise that eases economic sanctions in
exchange for the Iraqi government's cooperation with weapons
inspections. The General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church
(U.S.A.) has called for an end to economic sanctions together
with continued safeguards to prevent the government of Iraq
from developing or acquiring weapons of mass destruction.
Furthermore, these efforts with regard to Iraq should be part
of a worldwide effort to eliminate such weapons and end their
development by all nations.
- The United States must not again take or threaten military
action against Iraq. That would be a terrible example for
the international community and the American people of how
a great power exercises leadership.
Write or Phone:
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
U.S. Department of State
Washington, DC 20520
Fax: (202) 647-1533
Mr. A. Peter Burleigh
U.S. Mission to the United Nations
United Nations Plaza
New York, NY 10017
Background:
Iraq announced on Aug. 3 that it would no longer cooperate
with U.N. weapons inspectors. In response, at the U.S. government's
urging, the U.N. Security Council voted on Sept. 9 to suspend
its practice of periodically reviewing the U.N. sanctions against
Iraq. The U.S. was placed in an embarrassing situation in late
August when Secretary Albright was publicly accused by a former
U.N. arms inspector of actually undermining the inspection of
suspected weapons sites. The American, who was chief inspector
of the team, had been "relieved" of duties for a period
in March for being too aggressive. He charged that Secretary
Albright had "surrender[ed] to Iraqi leadership" in
order to avoid new confrontations with Iraq and to improve relations
with other Security Council members.
Some observers predict a unilateral U.S. attack on Iraq in
October. Others think this unlikely, but expect an escalating
humanitarian crisis caused by the sanctions while Washington
works in other ways to destabilize Saddam Hussein's regime.
U.N. Secretary General Annan has drawn up a proposal for comprehensive
review of the sanctions and the possibility of easing them in
exchange for Iraqi cooperation and "less than 100 percent"
disarmament. U.S. diplomats strongly oppose Annan's proposal
and insist that a number of other outstanding issues from the
1991 war with Kuwait must also be resolved before sanctions
can be lifted.
There is considerable domestic pressure on the Administration
to be tough and to maintain sanctions as long as Saddam Hussein
remains in power. Additionally, the U.S. Congress ratcheted
up tensions by beginning to broadcast "Radio Free Iraq"
into the country, voting $10 million for the Iraqi opposition,
and bringing competing Kurdish leaders to a unity session in
Washington.
The program that allows the purchase of goods for Iraqi civilians
by allowing Iraq to sell up to $5.2 billion in oil every six
months is failing to meet the need. Low oil prices and the run-down
condition of the country's oil industry has prevented Iraq from
being able to pump all the oil permitted. Moreover, the requirement
that the Security Council's sanctions committee approve the
importation of goods has created unnecessary delays.
General Assembly Guidance:
- the ending of all economic sanctions against Iraq that make
it difficult or impossible for essential items to reach the
people of Iraq, such as food, medicine, medical and hospital
supplies, including ambulances and bed sheets; school books
and other supplies, including building supplies that are necessary
for the educational system; materials needed to provide drinkable
water and sanitation; and to develop the allowable level of
oil-production capacity needed to generate the income to purchase
humanitarian and infrastructure supplies;
- the maintaining of safeguards, such as military sanctions,
that are designed to prevent the government of Iraq from acquiring
or developing the means of mass destruction, in such a manner
as not to prevent the delivery of items above;
- comprehensive efforts by the United Nations, the United
States, and the governments of the Middle East to remove all
weapons of mass destruction from that region, as part of a
worldwide effort to eliminate such weapons and end their development.
|