The Washington Office: the voice of Presbyterian public policy
PC (USA) Seal
 
 
 
Neighborly Fences and Hostile Walls
 
 
GAYRAUD S. WILMORE retired in 1990 as Professor of Church History at Johnson C. Smith Seminary, the Interdenomination Theological Center, in Atlanta. During the 1960s he was Executive Director of the United Presbyterian Commission on Religion and Race, which was later reconstituted as the Council on Church and Race.
 
"For he is our peace; in his flesh he has made both groups into one and has broken down the dividing wall, that is, the hostility between us"

(Eph. 2:14)

Sounds good, but is it true? I believe these words are true and worthy of universal application, but in terms of particular times and circumstances. For example, racial integration has brought down some troublesome dividing walls between the two most polarized racial/ethnic groups in the United States. But it is also true that racial integration between Blacks and Whites, since the end of the civil rights movement, has not been an unmixed blessing. First of all, with respect to voluntary social intercourse, public education, the church, and several other areas, it has not worked as well as many of us had hoped. Secondly, it has usually presented itself as a "one-way integration," mainly from Black to White. Whites have rarely been willing to integrate Black institutions and neighborhoods, except where the latter accede to White control or are experiencing displacement, as in the case of urban regentrification.

 
         
 

Thirdly, although it brought some positive gains, integration has tended to weaken the bond between African Americans and the cultural and religious heritage that previously helped them not only to survive, but to be self-esteeming and self-reliant despite the walls that White people threw up to keep them "in their place."

For these reasons and others many African Americans, while advocating a racial integration that goes two ways, nevertheless choose to retain their ethnic identity and cultural particularity, believing that they still have something important to contribute to the rest of America out of their ancestral heritage. They propose, in other words, friendly fences rather than wrathful walls. What do I mean by "wrathful walls"?

A Family Story

Early in the 1930s my parents moved to a predominantly White block of Jefferson Street in North Philadelphia. Next door lived a White policeman and his young wife who had a tiny baby boy. A few days after my parents moved in, the White neighbor, whose front door opened on the same stoop as ours, marched out angrily and extended to about eight feet high the low fence that separated the adjoining back yards. Apparently he did not want his wife to look upon Black faces when she hung out her washing on their clothesline. He wanted, it seems, to blot our blackness out of his sight and his life. So what was meant to be a neighborly fence suddenly became a hostile wall.

Some weeks later my mother heard a knock on our front door. Standing there was the young wife--in panic. The child in her arms had turned blue and was obviously choking to death. My mother, a strong and experienced country girl from Gloucester County, Virginia, calmly took over. She did a couple of skillful maneuvers with the baby's upper torso while with her fingers she pulled the obstruction out of its throat. The child breathed again and started bawling at the top of its lungs. The young mother grabbed him back with a barely audible murmur of thanks and fled into her house.

Late that night, after her husband returned home, we heard him out in the back yard with his tools, pulling down the six-foot extension he had built on top of the original fence.

This story does not have the ending most of us might prefer. The two families did not become fast friends after that. The most we gave each other was an occasional nod when accidentally meeting on the street, but the hostility between us vanished. The climate changed for the better until they finally moved away as the neighborhood became all-Black--as it is to this day.

Everyone knows Robert Frost's famous line about good fences making good neighbors. The Apostle Paul wasn't thinking about fences when he wrote Ephesians 2:14. Fences can be positive. They can help to demarcate the intimately personal from the impersonally public, the particular from the general, the church from the world. Not fences, but most walls need to be torn down.

Of course, no one should confuse our White policeman neighbor with Jesus Christ who, without waiting to receive our service, breaks down dividing walls that separate us from each other, and without destroying our uniqueness as persons and cultural groups, makes us one in himself. But we give thanks to God that the policeman was at least human enough to be ashamed of what his wall signified and humble enough to tear it down as a gesture of gratitude.

Walls suggest permanence, isolation, impenetrability, and alienation. The wall of ceremonial law and ritual meant hostile separation of Jew from Gentile in the Apostle Paul's time--in ours, of Black from White Americans. Two groups of people who are the same in so many ways, and yet are different, with different histories and experiences. The lingering question of the late twentieth century is: How can we preserve healthy cultural identities and contributive differences and yet be one people in Christ?

A Black Christian Perspective

Most of the old and new walls that separate us, like the one between my family's property and the policeman's, have to begin to be torn down from the White side rather than from the Black. It was, after all, White people who erected them in the first place. This does not mean that we Blacks have no responsibility from our side. It is a gross misunderstanding of Black liberation theology to suppose that all it does is encapsulate African-American Christians behind their own self-made walls and rob them of any incentive to reach out to others. In For My People: Black Theology and the Black Church, James H. Cone of Union Seminary in New York, the most prominent of African-American theologians, writes about ministering to the poor of our own ethnic communities, but he has no intention, nonetheless, of forcing any of us into a narrow ethnocentrism:

In our efforts to accent our particularities, we must be careful not to limit God to them or to remain enclosed in them ourselves ... We must, then, bear witness to our neighbors for the building of community defined by love, justice, and peace ...

We may say that Christ, in the most profound sense, has already guaranteed this "love, justice, and peace" by demolishing the dividing walls between us, but we know that some Supreme Court justices and lower court judges, some politicians and government bureaucrats, and some just ordinary citizens--not all of them White!--are busily erecting walls as fast as some of us try to tear them down. That's one of the reasons why race relations, despite integration, have been at such a low ebb in our country since the 1960s.

Over the years most African Americans, like my mother in the incident described above, have not permitted the walls to keep them from treating Whites like human beings. That is one of the remarkable influences that the Christian faith has had on generations of Black people. Historically we have had a peculiar aversion to any kind of wall. We know, almost instinctively, that the refusal to heed the cries of the needy and underprivileged, the mean-spirited resistance to affirmative action, the booming business in prison construction and the reluctance to reform the criminal justice system, the coldness many feel toward people in Africa, Asia and Latin America and toward people in our own midst whose sexual orientation may differ from ours, are all examples of how even Christians "wall in" some people and "wall out" others. These are not fences that can contribute to an appropriate neighborliness, but impenetrable walls that deny others the rights, responsibilities and opportunities that most of the rest of us enjoy as a matter of course.

When it comes to public service as a ministry of the church, not just Christian faith, but also Reformed theology has had an undeniable impact on African-American Christians. The traditional emphases of Black faith accord well with a comment by John Calvin in his sermon on I Timothy 6:17-19:

We must recognize that God has wanted to make us like members of a body. When we regard each other in this way, each will then conclude: I see my neighbor who has need of me and if I were in such extremity, I would wish to be helped; I must therefore do just that. ... God has joined us together and united us in one body, because he wants each to employ himself for his neighbors, so that no one is addicted to his own person, but that we serve all in common (cited in W.F. Graham, The Constructive Revolutionary, p. 70).

Presbyterians in the Struggle

That understanding of neighborliness is deeply etched in most Reformed churches. It certainly characterized the segment of American Presbyterians I knew best during the civil rights era. The Board of National Missions of the UPCUSA collaborated with the Roman Catholic Church in Chicago, with the Industrial Areas Foundation, and with the Interreligious Foundation for Community Organization to inaugurate a period of grassroots community organizing in the inner cities of the nation, unprecedented in our time.

The Commission on Ecumenical Mission and Relations brought missionaries home from foreign fields to walk picket lines and teach in Freedom Schools in the South at the height of the civil rights movement. The Board of Christian Education helped to launch the Commission on Religion and Race under the co-chairmanship of Marshall Scott, a White professor at McCormick Seminary, and Edler Hawkins, a Black pastor n the Bronx, thus guiding the denomination into the vortex of the movement as the first predominantly White church to respond to the call of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Eugene Carson Blake, the Stated Clerk of the General Assembly, was arrested for protesting segregation at a Baltimore amusement park, and at the March on Washington in 1963 he reminded the political establishment that the Christian churches of this nation were on the side of the poor and oppressed.

Nostalgia is charming, but mainly an exercise in futility. Those days are gone, but they will go down in history as the most impressive demonstration of this church's union with its disenfranchised and victimized neighbors. It was a time when Presbyterians, as Calvin counseled, refused to be "addicted to [their] own person ... [so as to] serve all in common." A time when Black and White Presbyterians, without disavowing each other's integrity and special gifts for humanization and societal transformation, came together to prove the secular relevance of the gospel to the struggle for liberty and justice for all.

Unity in Diversity

Today other strategies and tactics may be required, but we need to discover once more that form of Christian unity-in-diversity that allows neighborly fences, but breaks down hostile walls. Such a commitment always calls for sacrifice--sometimes even to dissolution and death. But that is what God demands--sacrifices that permit Christians to dismantle structures of power that impoverish, deal unjustly, and alienate--even as we acknowledge our different histories, perceptions, strategies, and styles of life.

Because Jesus Christ has broken down the wall of religion and made us members of one new humanity in himself, let us again become wall-breakers in the church, and in the society to find the secular equivalent of what the Lord did for us when he made peace between two estranged peoples by the blood of his cross.

References:

James H. Cone, For My People: Black Theology and the Black Church. Orbis Books, 1984.

W.F. Graham, The Constructive Revolutionary. John Knox Press, 1971.

 

 
PC(USA) Home (Link)
     
   
  Home  
   
  Legislative
Action Center
 
   
  About Us  
   
  Seminars / Programs  
   
  Theology  
   
  Resources  
   
  Subscribe  
   
  Washington Report  
   
  Advocacy Events  
   
     
 
 
     
  Link: Support Our Work  
     
  For more information on the Presbyterian Washington Office please contact us - 100 Maryland Avenue #410 - Washington, DC - 20002 - (202) 543-1126 - Fax (202) 543 - 7755 - or send us an email.  
     
  Link to Top of Page  
 
Contact PC (USA) (link)
Copyright Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). All Rights Reserved.